These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34786664)

  • 21. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of surgical start time on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Jun; 34(6):. PubMed ID: 33015706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
    Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surgical robotics for esophageal cancer.
    Grimminger PP; van der Horst S; Ruurda JP; van Det M; Morel P; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Dec; 1434(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 29741233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic esophagectomy: results from a tertiary care Italian center.
    Guerra F; Gia E; Minuzzo A; Tribuzi A; Di Marino M; Coratti A
    Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 33861402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Initial experience of robot-assisted minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Vetshev FP; Shestakov AL; Tadzhibova IM; Tskhovrebov AT; Bitarov TT; Shakhbanov ME
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2021; (2):20-26. PubMed ID: 33570350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. State of the art in esophagectomy: robotic assistance in the abdominal phase.
    de Groot EM; Goense L; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):823-830. PubMed ID: 33382446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
    Kanamori J; Watanabe M; Maruyama S; Kanie Y; Fujiwara D; Sakamoto K; Okamura A; Imamura Y
    Surg Today; 2022 Sep; 52(9):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 34853881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
    Rebecchi F; Ugliono E; Allaix ME; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2023 Feb; 75(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 35953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Oshikiri T; Goto H; Horikawa M; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7249-7257. PubMed ID: 34032960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
    Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
    Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
    van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Duan X; Yue J; Chen C; Gong L; Ma Z; Shang X; Yu Z; Jiang H
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6108-6116. PubMed ID: 33104915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.