These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34786749)

  • 21. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.
    Ohnhaus EE; Adler R
    Pain; 1975 Dec; 1(4):379-384. PubMed ID: 800639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
    Clark P; Lavielle P; Martínez H
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the construct validity and reproducibility of four different types of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Renskers L; van Uden RJJC; Huis AMP; Rongen SAA; Teerenstra S; van Riel PLCM
    Clin Rheumatol; 2018 Dec; 37(12):3191-3199. PubMed ID: 30209696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain.
    Euasobhon P; Atisook R; Bumrungchatudom K; Zinboonyahgoon N; Saisavoey N; Jensen MP
    Pain; 2022 Dec; 163(12):e1184-e1191. PubMed ID: 35584261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiplicative rating scales do not enable measurement of vision-related quality of life.
    Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 21198834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and Validation of the "Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire" (KEPAQ), a Disease-Specific Instrument for Evaluating Subjective Emotional Distress and Visual Function Through Rasch Analysis.
    Balparda K; Herrera-Chalarca T; Silva-Quintero LA; Torres-Soto SA; Vanegas-Ramírez CM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():1287-1296. PubMed ID: 32494119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain.
    Baños JE; Bosch F; Cañellas M; Bassols A; Ortega F; Bigorra J
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Feb; 11(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 2709918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scale Shortening and Decrease in Measurement Precision: Analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Its Short Forms in an Italian-Speaking Population With Neck Pain Disorders.
    Monticone M; Giordano A; Franchignoni F
    Phys Ther; 2021 Jun; 101(6):. PubMed ID: 33528001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applicability of tools to assess pain in elderly patients after cardiac surgery.
    Pesonen A; Suojaranta-Ylinen R; Tarkkila P; Rosenberg PH
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Feb; 52(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 17976221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.
    Williamson A; Hoggart B
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Aug; 14(7):798-804. PubMed ID: 16000093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods.
    Hobart J; Cano S
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Feb; 13(12):iii, ix-x, 1-177. PubMed ID: 19216837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study between different pain rating scales in patients of osteoarthritis.
    Bashir MS; Khade A; Borkar P; Saleem M; Lingaswamy V; Reddy D
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2013; 57(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 24617173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.
    Breivik EK; Björnsson GA; Skovlund E
    Clin J Pain; 2000 Mar; 16(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 10741815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus.
    Reich A; Heisig M; Phan NQ; Taneda K; Takamori K; Takeuchi S; Furue M; Blome C; Augustin M; Ständer S; Szepietowski JC
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2012 Sep; 92(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 22102095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The psychometric properties of cancer multisymptom assessment instruments: a clinical review.
    Aktas A; Walsh D; Kirkova J
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jul; 23(7):2189-202. PubMed ID: 25894883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale.
    Le May S; Ballard A; Khadra C; Gouin S; Plint AC; Villeneuve E; Mâsse B; Tsze DS; Neto G; Drendel AL; Auclair MC; McGrath PJ; Ali S
    Pain; 2018 Aug; 159(8):1508-1517. PubMed ID: 29608509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pain Intensity Assessment Scales for Dermatologic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review.
    Govas P; Ketchum A; Kazi R; Gordon BR; Carroll BT
    Dermatol Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 34923536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interpretation of response categories in patient-reported rating scales: a controlled study among people with Parkinson's disease.
    Knutsson I; Rydström H; Reimer J; Nyberg P; Hagell P
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Jun; 8():61. PubMed ID: 20576159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pain measurement in cancer patients: a comparison of six methods.
    de Conno F; Caraceni A; Gamba A; Mariani L; Abbattista A; Brunelli C; La Mura A; Vcntafridda V
    Pain; 1994 May; 57(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 8090512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing quantification of pain severity by verbal rating and numeric rating scales.
    Dijkers M
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2010; 33(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 20737796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.