132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34786823)
1. Use of infusion ports in patients with sickle cell disease: Indications and complications.
Ilonze C; Anderson M; Stubblefield A; Journeycake J; Sinha AA
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2022 Feb; 69(2):e29445. PubMed ID: 34786823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term central venous access in patients with sickle cell disease. Incidence of thrombotic and infectious complications.
Abdul-Rauf A; Gauderer M; Chiarucci K; Berman B
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 17(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 7583391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications of PORT-A-CATH® in patients with sickle cell disease.
Alkindi S; Matwani S; Al-Maawali A; Al-Maskari B; Pathare A
J Infect Public Health; 2012 Mar; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 22341844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a dual lumen port for automated red cell exchange in adults with sickle cell disease.
Shrestha A; Jawa Z; Koch KL; Rankin AB; Xiang Q; Padmanabhan A; Karafin MS; Field JJ
J Clin Apher; 2015 Dec; 30(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 25790325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implantable venous access devices in children with severe hemophilia: a tertiary pediatric institutional experience.
Bedoya MA; Raffini L; Durand R; Acord MR; Srinivasan A; Krishnamurthy G; Vatsky S; Escobar F; Cahill AM
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jul; 50(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 32390060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.
Biffi R; de Braud F; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Mauri S; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F; Andreoni B
Ann Oncol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 9739444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications of implantable venous access devices in patients with sickle cell disease.
Shah N; Landi D; Shah R; Rothman J; De Castro LM; Thornburg CD
Am J Hematol; 2012 Feb; 87(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 22081438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.
Hills JR; Cardella JF; Cardella K; Waybill PN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 9399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.
Schenck M; Schneider T; Rübben H; Eisenhardt A
World J Urol; 2012 Jun; 30(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21874511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications of radiologically placed central venous ports and Hickman catheters in patients with AIDS.
Muscedere G; Bennett JD; Lee TY; Mackie I; Vanderburgh L
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Apr; 49(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 9561010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients.
Eastridge BJ; Lefor AT
J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jan; 13(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 7799025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Estes JM; Rocconi R; Straughn JM; Bhoola S; Leath CA; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 14675682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study.
Kuriakose P; Colon-Otero G; Paz-Fumagalli R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):179-84. PubMed ID: 11830624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients.
Moureau N; Poole S; Murdock MA; Gray SM; Semba CP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Oct; 13(10):1009-16. PubMed ID: 12397122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological placement of chest ports in pediatric oncology patients.
Cil BE
Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov; 14(11):2015-9. PubMed ID: 15249980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
