These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34787684)

  • 21. Two types of memory-based (pantomime) reaches distinguished by gaze anchoring in reach-to-grasp tasks.
    Kuntz JR; Karl JM; Doan JB; Grohs M; Whishaw IQ
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 381():112438. PubMed ID: 31857149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seeing all the obstacles in your way: the effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching.
    Chapman CS; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(2):363-75. PubMed ID: 20041232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.
    Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110175. PubMed ID: 25303211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension.
    Tresilian JR
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(3):352-68. PubMed ID: 9628422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mental blocks: fMRI reveals top-down modulation of early visual cortex when obstacles interfere with grasp planning.
    Chapman CS; Gallivan JP; Culham JC; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1703-17. PubMed ID: 21376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.
    Magdalon EC; Michaelsen SM; Quevedo AA; Levin MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 21684505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?
    Cheng KC; McKay SM; King EC; Maki BE
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 May; 218(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 22411582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Hening W; Tunik E; Sage J; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):186-202. PubMed ID: 16041510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Grasping a 2D virtual target: The influence of target position and movement on gaze and digit placement.
    Langridge RW; Marotta JJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102625. PubMed ID: 32452441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points?
    Voudouris D; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Oct; 31(5):1090-102. PubMed ID: 22698834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.
    Karl JM; Schneider LR; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):465-77. PubMed ID: 23288327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Missing in action: the effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching.
    Chapman CS; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 191(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 18716765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of both hand and target matters in reaching and grasping movements.
    Ambron E; Schettino LF; Coyle M; Jax S; Coslett HB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():160-168. PubMed ID: 28957732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probing the reaching-grasping network in humans through multivoxel pattern decoding.
    Di Bono MG; Begliomini C; Castiello U; Zorzi M
    Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00412. PubMed ID: 26664793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 12783144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of monocular viewing on hand-eye coordination during sequential grasping and placing movements.
    Gonzalez DA; Niechwiej-Szwedo E
    Vision Res; 2016 Nov; 128():30-38. PubMed ID: 27664351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.