These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Bisphenol A toxicity and dentistry: is it panic time or not? Brown RS; Wahl MJ Dent Today; 2009 Aug; 28(8):10, 12. PubMed ID: 19715064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials. Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biological aspects of materials recommended as alternatives to amalgams]. Půza V; Novák L; Cervinka M; Kolárová J Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1995; 38(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9441372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mercury, danger in the dental office]. Belmont Laguna F; Ojeda León S Pract Odontol; 1988 Sep; 9(9):18-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 3077460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercury in dentistry: a review. van der Bijl P; Dreyer WP; van Wyk CW J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1987 Sep; 42(9):537-41. PubMed ID: 3077218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mercury poisoning in dental offices in Vilnius]. MICELMACHER A Sveikatos Apsauga; 1961 Sep; 6():10-5. PubMed ID: 14473309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A biocompatible material for the new millennium: dental amalgam. Wahl MJ Dent Today; 2001 Nov; 20(11):16. PubMed ID: 11715644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury and dentistry. The controversy continues. Balevi B Oral Health; 1988 Jun; 78(6):21-4. PubMed ID: 3269988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological properties of dental materials. Smith DC Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1969 Nov; 20(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 5260860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [In vitro toxicity of materials used in conservative and prosthetic dentistry. I. Amalgams and cements]. Sbordone L; Russo P; Sbordone R; Police P Minerva Stomatol; 1983; 32(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 6577278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mercury as a pollutant in the dental profession. I. Its biological cycle, toxicity and monitoring]. Valerio M; Sapino S; Moniaci D; Zoccola GC Minerva Stomatol; 1990 Aug; 39(8):625-8. PubMed ID: 2287331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dental materials and their safety]. Horibe T Shikai Tenbo; 1978; 51(5):960-6. PubMed ID: 295871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlation analyses between cell cultures and animal experiments]. Schmalz G Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Feb; 37(2):184-6. PubMed ID: 6951706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital admissions for neurological and renal diseases among dentists and dental assistants occupationally exposed to mercury. Thygesen LC; Flachs EM; Hanehøj K; Kjuus H; Juel K Occup Environ Med; 2011 Dec; 68(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 21508427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytotoxic action of filling materials on human embryonic fibroblast cell cultures]. Novokhatskiĭ AS; Mikhaĭlova GR; Levina DS; Karal'nik DM; Chechina GN Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1980; 59(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 6929588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Amalgam. VII. Toxic effects of mercury from amalgam fillings]. Groten JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Aug; 100(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 11822123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental amalgam and mercury toxicity: should dentists be concerned? Pretorius E; Naudé H SADJ; 2003 Nov; 58(10):366-9. PubMed ID: 15042881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]