These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34788362)

  • 1. SuperMICE: An Ensemble Machine Learning Approach to Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations.
    Laqueur HS; Shev AB; Kagawa RMC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 191(3):516-525. PubMed ID: 34788362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
    Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MISL: Multiple imputation by super learning.
    Carpenito T; Manjourides J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):1904-1915. PubMed ID: 35658622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study.
    Shah AD; Bartlett JW; Carpenter J; Nicholas O; Hemingway H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(6):764-74. PubMed ID: 24589914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.
    Beesley LJ; Bondarenko I; Elliot MR; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Taylor JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2685-2700. PubMed ID: 34643465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing Value Estimation using Clustering and Deep Learning within Multiple Imputation Framework.
    Samad MD; Abrar S; Diawara N
    Knowl Based Syst; 2022 Aug; 249():. PubMed ID: 36159738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction Model Performance With Different Imputation Strategies: A Simulation Study Using a North American ICU Registry.
    Steif J; Brant R; Sreepada RS; West N; Murthy S; Görges M
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e29-e44. PubMed ID: 34560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of prognostic models depended on the choice of missing value imputation algorithm: a simulation study.
    Deforth M; Heinze G; Held U
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Dec; 176():111539. PubMed ID: 39326470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation using auxiliary imputation variables that only predict missingness can increase bias due to data missing not at random.
    Curnow E; Cornish RP; Heron JE; Carpenter JR; Tilling K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):231. PubMed ID: 39375597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fair comparison of tree-based and parametric methods in multiple imputation by chained equations.
    Slade E; Naylor MG
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(8):1156-1166. PubMed ID: 31997388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical imputation of systematically and sporadically missing data: An approximate Bayesian approach using chained equations.
    Jolani S
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):333-351. PubMed ID: 28990686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple imputation with sequential penalized regression.
    Zahid FM; Heumann C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1311-1327. PubMed ID: 29451087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nonparametric multiple imputation approach for missing categorical data.
    Zhou M; He Y; Yu M; Hsu CH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28587662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanism-aware imputation: a two-step approach in handling missing values in metabolomics.
    Dekermanjian JP; Shaddox E; Nandy D; Ghosh D; Kechris K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 35578165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of existing methods for multiple imputation in individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Kunkel D; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(22):3507-3532. PubMed ID: 28695667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of missing data in Bayesian network structure learning: an application to linked biomedical and social survey data.
    Ke X; Keenan K; Smith VA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):326. PubMed ID: 36536286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data.
    Resche-Rigon M; White IR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1634-1649. PubMed ID: 27647809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates.
    Austin PC; van Buuren S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2172-2183. PubMed ID: 37750213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.