These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34788366)

  • 1. Bone Marrow Collection: Comparison of Unassisted vs Assisted Bedside Collections by a Laboratory Technologist.
    Ali SF; Cloe A; Siaghani PJ; Himchak E; Cantu D; Gaal K; Kim YS; Afkhami M; Pillai R; Chan W; Quirk E; Weisenburger DD; Aoun P; Song JY
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2022 Apr; 157(4):573-577. PubMed ID: 34788366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, biopsy imprints, and biopsy sections.
    Pasquale D; Chikkappa G
    Am J Hematol; 1986 Aug; 22(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 3728456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of touch imprints with aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.
    Aboul-Nasr R; Estey EH; Kantarjian HM; Freireich EJ; Andreeff M; Johnson BJ; Albitar M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 111(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 10361510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Touch imprints and aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.
    Bouton SM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jan; 115(1):160-1. PubMed ID: 11190803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone marrow biopsy imprints (touch preparations) for assessment of iron stores.
    Pasquale D; Chikkappa G
    Am J Hematol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 7532354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone marrow examination: techniques and interpretation.
    Hyun BH; Gulati GL; Ashton JK
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 2(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 3065315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in routinely processed bone marrow aspirate clot and core biopsy sections.
    Miranda RN; Mark HF; Medeiros LJ
    Am J Pathol; 1994 Dec; 145(6):1309-14. PubMed ID: 7992836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections.
    Sabharwal BD; Malhotra V; Aruna S; Grewal R
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 2132243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of trisomy 12 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Liso V; Capalbo S; Lapietra A; Pavone V; Guarini A; Specchia G
    Haematologica; 1999 Mar; 84(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 10189384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of touch imprints with aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.
    Barekman CL; Cotelingam JD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec; 116(6):945. PubMed ID: 11764083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fundamentals of bone marrow examination.
    Hyun BH; Stevenson AJ; Hanau CA
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 8(4):651-63. PubMed ID: 7525532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone marrow aspirate collection and preparation--a comparison of three methods.
    DiFrancesco T; Boychuk DJ; Lafferty JD; Crowther MA
    Clin Invest Med; 2012 Jun; 35(3):E114-6. PubMed ID: 22673313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bone marrow aspirate cytology, touch imprint cytology and trephine biopsy for bone marrow evaluation.
    Chandra S; Chandra H
    Hematol Rep; 2011 Oct; 3(3):e22. PubMed ID: 22593814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A histopathological study of bone marrow in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone marrow biopsy changes before chemotherapy and comparison with bone marrow smears].
    Pu Q; Tang CS; Zhou RH
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Sep; 30(9):566-8, 595. PubMed ID: 1806340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the sequence of pull of bone marrow aspirates on plasma cell quantification in plasma cell proliferative disorders.
    Jain G; Das N; Gajendra S; Gangwar SP; Gupta R; Mallik S; Sharma A; Kumar L; Upadhyay AD
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2022 Oct; 44(5):837-845. PubMed ID: 36106595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative utility of diagnostic bone-marrow components: a 10-year study.
    Barekman CL; Fair KP; Cotelingam JD
    Am J Hematol; 1997 Sep; 56(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9298866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone marrow metastasis by solid tumors--probable hematological indicators and comparison of bone marrow aspirate, touch imprint and trephine biopsy.
    Chandra S; Chandra H; Saini S
    Hematology; 2010 Oct; 15(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 20863433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of bone marrow biopsy imprint in evaluating cellularity].
    Lu XG; Huang LS; Xu XH; Yang JJ; Zhu L; Zhao XY; Xu GB
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 May; 35(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 16764040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration in multiple myeloma: usefulness of bone marrow aspirate clot with CD138 immunohistochemistry.
    Matsue K; Matsue Y; Kumata K; Usui Y; Suehara Y; Fukumoto K; Fujisawa M; Narita K; Takeuchi M
    Hematol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 27140172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
    Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.