These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34788699)

  • 1. Predicting explicit memory for meaningful cartoons from visual paired comparison in infants and toddlers.
    Kingo OS; Sonne T; Krøjgaard P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105316. PubMed ID: 34788699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of performance on an automated visual recognition memory task in 7.5-month-old infants.
    Dzwilewski KLC; Merced-Nieves FM; Aguiar A; Korrick SA; Schantz SL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2020; 81():106904. PubMed ID: 32485220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meaningful Memory? Eighteen-Month-Olds Only Remember Cartoons With a Meaningful Storyline.
    Sonne T; Kingo OS; Krøjgaard P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2388. PubMed ID: 30546338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention, novelty preference and the visual paired comparison task.
    Eizenman M; Chung J; Yu M; Jia H; Jiang P
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 Jun; 183():52-56. PubMed ID: 30445047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 6-, 10-, and 12-month-olds remember complex dynamic events across 2 weeks.
    Sonne T; Kingo OS; Krøjgaard P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 May; 229():105627. PubMed ID: 36696740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual attention to meaningful stimuli by 1- to 3-year olds: implications for the measurement of memory.
    Hayne H; Jaeger K; Sonne T; Gross J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2016 Nov; 58(7):808-816. PubMed ID: 27753455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional Measures of Memory in Typically Developing and Hypoxic-Ischemic Injured Infants.
    Wagner JB; Jabès A; Norwood A; Nelson CA
    Brain Sci; 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of children's performance on two recognition memory tasks: delayed nonmatch-to-sample versus visual paired-comparison.
    Overman WH; Bachevalier J; Sewell F; Drew J
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 Sep; 26(6):345-57. PubMed ID: 8119484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novelty preference in patients with developmental amnesia.
    Munoz M; Chadwick M; Perez-Hernandez E; Vargha-Khadem F; Mishkin M
    Hippocampus; 2011 Dec; 21(12):1268-76. PubMed ID: 20882542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bound to remember: Infants show superior memory for objects presented at event boundaries.
    Sonne T; Kingo OS; Krøjgaard P
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 58(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 28252194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.
    Ward EJ; Chun MM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 33(37):14749-57. PubMed ID: 24027275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of attention on infants' preference for briefly exposed visual stimuli in the paired-comparison recognition-memory paradigm.
    Richards JE
    Dev Psychol; 1997 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9050387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of robust recognition memory early in life even when assessed by reaching behavior.
    Diamond A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Jun; 59(3):419-56. PubMed ID: 7622987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring infant memory: Utility of the visual paired-comparison test paradigm for studies in developmental neurotoxicology.
    Burbacher TM; Grant KS
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2012; 34(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 22750243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transition from novelty to familiarity preference depending on recognition performance by 4-yr.-olds.
    Uehara I
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):837-48. PubMed ID: 11191399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What form of memory underlies novelty preferences?
    Snyder KA; Blank MP; Marsolek CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):315-21. PubMed ID: 18488646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns.
    Musen G; Treisman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jan; 16(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 2136749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of object recognition memory in rhesus macaques with neonatal lesions of the perirhinal cortex.
    Zeamer A; Richardson RL; Weiss AR; Bachevalier J
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 11():31-41. PubMed ID: 25096364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.