214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34789150)
1. CoRe: a robustly benchmarked R package for identifying core-fitness genes in genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; Karakoc E; Pacini C; Perron U; De Lucia RR; Garnett MJ; Iorio F
BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):828. PubMed ID: 34789150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced gene templates for supervised analysis of scale-limited CRISPR-Cas9 fitness screens.
Vinceti A; Perron U; Trastulla L; Iorio F
Cell Rep; 2022 Jul; 40(4):111145. PubMed ID: 35905712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.
Hart T; Chandrashekhar M; Aregger M; Steinhart Z; Brown KR; MacLeod G; Mis M; Zimmermann M; Fradet-Turcotte A; Sun S; Mero P; Dirks P; Sidhu S; Roth FP; Rissland OS; Durocher D; Angers S; Moffat J
Cell; 2015 Dec; 163(6):1515-26. PubMed ID: 26627737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial gene suppression improves identification of cancer vulnerabilities when CRISPR-Cas9 knockout is pan-lethal.
Krill-Burger JM; Dempster JM; Borah AA; Paolella BR; Root DE; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Hahn WC; McFarland JM; Vazquez F; Tsherniak A
Genome Biol; 2023 Aug; 24(1):192. PubMed ID: 37612728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An interactive web application for processing, correcting, and visualizing genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; De Lucia RR; Cremaschi P; Perron U; Karakoc E; Mauri L; Fernandez C; Kluczynski KH; Anderson DS; Iorio F
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Jan; 3(1):100373. PubMed ID: 36814834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting.
Iorio F; Behan FM; Gonçalves E; Bhosle SG; Chen E; Shepherd R; Beaver C; Ansari R; Pooley R; Wilkinson P; Harper S; Butler AP; Stronach EA; Saez-Rodriguez J; Yusa K; Garnett MJ
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):604. PubMed ID: 30103702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiplex enCas12a screens detect functional buffering among paralogs otherwise masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens.
Dede M; McLaughlin M; Kim E; Hart T
Genome Biol; 2020 Oct; 21(1):262. PubMed ID: 33059726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens.
Li W; Xu H; Xiao T; Cong L; Love MI; Zhang F; Irizarry RA; Liu JS; Brown M; Liu XS
Genome Biol; 2014; 15(12):554. PubMed ID: 25476604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.
Meyers RM; Bryan JG; McFarland JM; Weir BA; Sizemore AE; Xu H; Dharia NV; Montgomery PG; Cowley GS; Pantel S; Goodale A; Lee Y; Ali LD; Jiang G; Lubonja R; Harrington WF; Strickland M; Wu T; Hawes DC; Zhivich VA; Wyatt MR; Kalani Z; Chang JJ; Okamoto M; Stegmaier K; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Vazquez F; Root DE; Hahn WC; Tsherniak A
Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1779-1784. PubMed ID: 29083409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency data sets.
Dempster JM; Pacini C; Pantel S; Behan FM; Green T; Krill-Burger J; Beaver CM; Younger ST; Zhivich V; Najgebauer H; Allen F; Gonçalves E; Shepherd R; Doench JG; Yusa K; Vazquez F; Parts L; Boehm JS; Golub TR; Hahn WC; Root DE; Garnett MJ; Tsherniak A; Iorio F
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5817. PubMed ID: 31862961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrative analysis of pooled CRISPR genetic screens using MAGeCKFlute.
Wang B; Wang M; Zhang W; Xiao T; Chen CH; Wu A; Wu F; Traugh N; Wang X; Li Z; Mei S; Cui Y; Shi S; Lipp JJ; Hinterndorfer M; Zuber J; Brown M; Li W; Liu XS
Nat Protoc; 2019 Mar; 14(3):756-780. PubMed ID: 30710114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A benchmark of algorithms for the analysis of pooled CRISPR screens.
Bodapati S; Daley TP; Lin X; Zou J; Qi LS
Genome Biol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32151271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-scale CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library.
Henkel L; Rauscher B; Schmitt B; Winter J; Boutros M
BMC Biol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 33228647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovering false negatives in CRISPR fitness screens with JLOE.
Dede M; Hart T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Feb; 51(4):1637-1651. PubMed ID: 36727483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved analysis of CRISPR fitness screens and reduced off-target effects with the BAGEL2 gene essentiality classifier.
Kim E; Hart T
Genome Med; 2021 Jan; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 33407829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. caRpools: an R package for exploratory data analysis and documentation of pooled CRISPR/Cas9 screens.
Winter J; Breinig M; Heigwer F; Brügemann D; Leible S; Pelz O; Zhan T; Boutros M
Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):632-4. PubMed ID: 26508755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CEN-tools: an integrative platform to identify the contexts of essential genes.
Sharma S; Dincer C; Weidemüller P; Wright GJ; Petsalaki E
Mol Syst Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e9698. PubMed ID: 33073517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pooled genome-wide CRISPR screening for basal and context-specific fitness gene essentiality in
Viswanatha R; Li Z; Hu Y; Perrimon N
Elife; 2018 Jul; 7():. PubMed ID: 30051818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells.
Chan K; Tong AHY; Brown KR; Mero P; Moffat J
J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31545321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 systems for large-scale functional screening.
Sun N; Petiwala S; Wang R; Lu C; Hu M; Ghosh S; Hao Y; Miller CP; Chung N
BMC Genomics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 30890156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
