These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34790308)

  • 1. Imaging in Carcinoma Cervix and Revised 2018 FIGO Staging System: Implications in Radiology Reporting.
    Dhamija E; Gulati M; Manchanda S; Singhal S; Sharma D; Kumar S; Bhatla N
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 31(3):623-634. PubMed ID: 34790308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain.
    Salvo G; Odetto D; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):873-878. PubMed ID: 32241876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vulvar Cancer: 2021 Revised FIGO Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
    Virarkar M; Vulasala SS; Daoud T; Javadi S; Lall C; Bhosale P
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 35565394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
    Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
    Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
    Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
    Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.
    Freeman SJ; Aly AM; Kataoka MY; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
    Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1805-27. PubMed ID: 23065170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
    Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
    Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
    Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
    Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparative Study between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical FIGO Criteria in Different Stages of Carcinoma Cervix.
    Zubery MH; Rahman FB; Islam MN; Datta A; Rahman T; Mahdi R
    Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 34605487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problematic issues in the staging of endometrial, cervical and vulval carcinomas.
    Hirschowitz L; Nucci M; Zaino RJ
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):176-202. PubMed ID: 23240675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.
    Marnitz S; Tsunoda AT; Martus P; Vieira M; Affonso Junior RJ; Nunes J; Budach V; Hertel H; Mustea A; Sehouli J; Scharf JP; Ulrich U; Ebert A; Piwonski I; Kohler C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1855-1861. PubMed ID: 33293284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics staging for early invasive squamous cervical cancer.
    Takeshima N; Yanoh K; Tabata T; Nagai K; Hirai Y; Hasumi K
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Aug; 74(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 10419727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing survival outcomes for cervical cancer based on the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging systems.
    Shin W; Ham TY; Park YR; Lim MC; Won YJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6988. PubMed ID: 33772044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.