These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3479357)

  • 1. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials.
    Lloyd CH; Adamson M
    Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 3479357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fracture toughness of tooth coloured restorative materials.
    Lloyd CH; Mitchell L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 May; 11(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 6588177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement.
    Eakle WS
    Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properties of class V restorative materials.
    Powers JM; Fan PL; Hostetler RW
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 63(4):275-7. PubMed ID: 6941028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternatives to amalgam alloys: 1.
    McLean JW
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):432-3. PubMed ID: 6241477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of non-eugenol periodontal dressing materials upon the surface hardness of anterior restorative materials in vitro.
    Watts TL; Combe EC
    Br Dent J; 1981 Dec; 151(12):423-5. PubMed ID: 6947803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength of composite to composite and bond strength of composite to glass ionomer lining cements.
    Gordon AA; von der Lehr WN; Herrin HK
    Gen Dent; 1986; 34(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 3527863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New direct restorative materials].
    Hickel R; Dasch W; Janda R; Tyas M; Anusavice K
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Apr; 106(4):128-40. PubMed ID: 11930356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Discoloration of esthetic restorative materials, with special reference to the relation of the discoloration and the surface roughness of the specimens and electron microprobe analysis of the sulfurated surface].
    Sugawara A; Nishiyama M; Ohashi M
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1984 Sep; 3(5):562-73. PubMed ID: 6596745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to amalgam alloys: 2.
    Yardley RM
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):434-5. PubMed ID: 6597725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Suasha P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strengths of restorative materials to dentin.
    Chan DC; Reinhardt JW; Schulein TM
    Gen Dent; 1985; 33(3):236-8. PubMed ID: 3896919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical considerations concerning glass ionomer cements used for basing amalgam restorations.
    O'Hara JW; McManus DB
    Compendium; 1990 Mar; 11(3):130, 132, 134-6. PubMed ID: 2376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method of testing the union between glass ionomer cement and composite resin.
    Mount GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1988 Dec; 33(6):462-6. PubMed ID: 3072942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.