These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34794063)

  • 1. Direct STR typing from human bones.
    Phua CH; Kitpipit T; Pradutkanchana J; Duangsuwan P; Samai W; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111099. PubMed ID: 34794063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative performance of AmpFLSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR amplification kit and QIAGEN® Investigator® IDplex Plus kit.
    Mattayat D; Kitpipit T; Phetpeng S; Asawutmangkul W; Thanakiatkrai P
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):468-474. PubMed ID: 27914554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Zupanc T; Balažic J; Geršak ŽM; Stojković O; Skadrić I; Črešnar M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():17-26. PubMed ID: 27907810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel, 4-h DNA extraction method for STR typing of casework bone samples.
    Hasap L; Chotigeat W; Pradutkanchana J; Vongvatcharanon U; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Mar; 134(2):461-471. PubMed ID: 31897668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct PCR amplification from saliva sample using non-direct multiplex STR kits for forensic DNA typing.
    Shrivastava P; Jain T; Kumawat RK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):7112. PubMed ID: 33782478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neither femur nor tooth: Petrous bone for identifying archaeological bone samples via forensic approach.
    Pilli E; Vai S; Caruso MG; D'Errico G; Berti A; Caramelli D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():144-149. PubMed ID: 29301114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. As solid as a rock-comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of the petrosal bone as a source of DNA for forensic identification of challenging cranial bones.
    Kulstein G; Hadrys T; Wiegand P
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jan; 132(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28755253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci.
    Kloosterman AD; Kersbergen P
    J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 15005516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic genetic analysis of bone remain samples.
    Siriboonpiputtana T; Rinthachai T; Shotivaranon J; Peonim V; Rerkamnuaychoke B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():167-175. PubMed ID: 29408726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of nuclear DNA yield and STR typing success in Second World War petrous bones and metacarpals III.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Inkret J; Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102578. PubMed ID: 34425360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of quality controls in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ and Investigator® 24plex STR kits with a variety of forensic samples.
    Harrel M; Mayes C; Houston R; Holmes AS; Gutierrez R; Hughes S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102586. PubMed ID: 34530399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of DNA yield and STR profiles from the diaphysis, mid-diaphysis, and metaphysis regions of femur and tibia long bones.
    Klavens A; Kollmann DD; Elkins KM; Zeller CB
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1104-1113. PubMed ID: 33369740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autosomal short tandem repeat analysis of ancient DNA by coupled use of mini- and conventional STR kits.
    Oh CS; Lee SJ; Park JB; Lee SD; Seo SB; Kim HY; Kim J; Kim YS; Shin DH
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):820-5. PubMed ID: 22268568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.
    Ambers A; Votrubova J; Vanek D; Sajantila A; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1545-1553. PubMed ID: 29476237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategy for STR typing of bones from the Second World War combining CE and NGS technology: A pilot study.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Fattorini P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102401. PubMed ID: 33171316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of extra PCR cycles when amplifying skeletal samples with the GlobalFiler
    Harrel M; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 May; 133(3):745-750. PubMed ID: 29845343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance testing of a semi-automatic card punch system, using direct STR profiling of DNA from blood samples on FTA™ cards.
    Ogden SJ; Horton JK; Stubbs SL; Tatnell PJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S207-12. PubMed ID: 25407399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.