170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34794729)
1. Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach.
Ahn JW; You SG; Go EB; Lee SH; Kim JS; Cho HJ; Roh HJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 34794729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conservative surgery of uterine adenomyosis via laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach in a single institution.
Kwack JY; Im KS; Kwon YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 29845687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of surgical outcomes between robot and laparoscopy-assisted adenomyomectomy.
Shim JI; Jo EH; Kim M; Kim MK; Kim ML; Yun BS; Seong SJ; Jung YW
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(18):e15466. PubMed ID: 31045825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterine-Sparing Laparoscopic Pelvic Plexus Ablation, Uterine Artery Occlusion, and Partial Adenomyomectomy for Adenomyosis.
Yang W; Liu M; Liu L; Jiang C; Chen L; Qu X; Cheng Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):940-945. PubMed ID: 28552655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transient occlusion of uterine arteries in laparoscopic uterine surgery.
Kwon YS; Roh HJ; Ahn JW; Lee SH; Im KS
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00189. PubMed ID: 25848179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Clinical and Reproductive Outcomes between Adenomyomectomy and Myomectomy.
Hlinecka K; Mara M; Boudova B; Lisa Z; Richtarova A; Kuzel D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34670164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conservative surgery of diffuse adenomyosis with TOUA: Single surgeon experience of one hundred sixteen cases and report of fertility outcomes.
Kwack JY; Kwon YS
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2018 May; 34(5):290-294. PubMed ID: 29699636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic Uterine Artery Occlusion Combined with Uterine-sparing Pelvic Plexus Block and Partial Adenomyomectomy for Adenomyosis: A Video Case Report.
Chen D; Ai G; Yang W; Liu J; Luo N; Guo J; Cheng Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1681-1684. PubMed ID: 34051355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fertility-sparing surgery for diffuse adenomyosis: a narrated, stepwise approach to the Osada procedure.
Lu C; Corbett C; Elliott JE; Evans D
Fertil Steril; 2022 Sep; 118(3):588-590. PubMed ID: 35961921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical Efficacy among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors in Adenomyosis.
Ji L; Jin L; Zheng S; Shao M; Cui D; Hu M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 36940680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conservative adenomyomectomy with transient occlusion of uterine arteries for diffuse uterine adenomyosis.
Kwon YS; Roh HJ; Ahn JW; Lee SH; Im KS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jun; 41(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 25510633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-Bag Manual Extraction of Excised Myomas by Surgical Scalpel through Suprapubic Mini-Laparotomic Incision in Laparoscopic-Assisted Myomectomy.
Takeda A; Watanabe K; Hayashi S; Imoto S; Nakamura H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 26946277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Surgery for Focal Adenomyosis.
Kwack JY; Kwon YS
JSLS; 2017; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 28642638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of the efficacy and recurrence of adenomyomectomy for severe uterine diffuse adenomyosis via laparotomy versus laparoscopy: a long-term result in a single institution.
Zhu L; Chen S; Che X; Xu P; Huang X; Zhang X
J Pain Res; 2019; 12():1917-1924. PubMed ID: 31303783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic myomectomy with uterine artery ligation via a retroperitoneal approach is feasible in women with large uterine leiomyoma.
Noh JJ; Kim J; Paik ES; Kang JH; Jeong SY; Choi CH; Lee YY; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim TJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 60(4):752-757. PubMed ID: 34247819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic-Assisted Myomectomy with Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion/Ligation.
MacKoul P; Baxi R; Danilyants N; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR; Kazi N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):856-864. PubMed ID: 30170179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Zullo F; Venturella R; Raffone A; Saccone G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):CD013352. PubMed ID: 32374421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation plus myomectomy vs traditional laparoscopic myomectomy for "large" uterine fibroids: comparison of clinical efficacy.
Ciavattini A; Clemente N; Delli Carpini G; Saccardi C; Borgato S; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28956149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic or Robotic Adenomyomectomy with or without Medical Treatment for Severely Symptomatic Adenomyosis.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Lee YS
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 26894488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical results of uterine artery ligation in myomectomy.
Akbaba E; Kilicci C
Ann Ital Chir; 2023; 94():498-505. PubMed ID: 38051504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
