These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3479474)
1. Failure stress criteria for composite resin. De Groot R; Peters MC; De Haan YM; Dop GJ; Plasschaert AJ J Dent Res; 1987 Dec; 66(12):1748-52. PubMed ID: 3479474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of ferrule effect and length of cast and FRC posts on the stresses in anterior teeth. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):e227-37. PubMed ID: 23870819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical performance of a dental composite: probabilistic failure prediction. van der Varst PG; Brekelmans WA; de Vree JH; de Groot R J Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 72(8):1249-56. PubMed ID: 8360371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. Ban S; Anusavice KJ J Dent Res; 1990 Dec; 69(12):1791-9. PubMed ID: 2250083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture mechanics parameters for failure prediction of composite resins. De Groot R; Van Elst HC; Peters MC J Dent Res; 1988 Jun; 67(6):919-24. PubMed ID: 3049720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical view on biaxial and short-beam uniaxial flexural strength tests applied to resin composites using Weibull, fractographic and finite element analyses. Pick B; Meira JB; Driemeier L; Braga RR Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 19819002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of strength properties of light-cured resin composites. Brosh T; Ganor Y; Belov I; Pilo R Dent Mater; 1999 May; 15(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 10551080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens. Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Poitevin A; Van der Sloten J; Van Meerbeek B; Van Oosterwyck H Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 18554711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress analysis in bone tissue around single implants with different diameters and veneering materials: a 3-D finite element study. Santiago Junior JF; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Carvalho PS Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Dec; 33(8):4700-14. PubMed ID: 24094178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations. Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strengths of two different gingiva-colored materials bonded to commercially pure titanium and acrylic artificial teeth. Elzarug YA; Galburt RB; Ali A; Finkelman M; Dam HG J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 24521462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of customized composite resin fibreglass posts on the mechanics of restored treated teeth. Anchieta RB; Rocha EP; Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Martin M; Martini AP; Archangelo CM; Ko CC Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 22070803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces. De Munck J; Luehrs AK; Poitevin A; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 23570626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]