BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34796481)

  • 1. Sexual dimorphism in the first rib of Homo sapiens.
    Arlegi M; García-Sagastibelza A; Veschambre-Couture C; Gómez-Olivencia A
    J Anat; 2022 May; 240(5):959-971. PubMed ID: 34796481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual Dimorphism of the First Rib: A Comparative Approach Using Metric and Geometric Morphometric Analyses.
    Lynch JJ; Cross P; Heaton V
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 28168691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A geometric morphometric approach to the study of sexual dimorphism in the modern human frontal bone.
    Del Bove A; Profico A; Riga A; Bucchi A; Lorenzo C
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Dec; 173(4):643-654. PubMed ID: 33025582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological and functional implications of sexual dimorphism in the human skeletal thorax.
    García-Martínez D; Torres-Tamayo N; Torres-Sanchez I; García-Río F; Bastir M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Nov; 161(3):467-477. PubMed ID: 27444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size and shape of human mandible: Sex differences and influence of age on sex estimation accuracy.
    Toneva DH; Nikolova SY; Fileva NF; Zlatareva DK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2023 Nov; 65():102322. PubMed ID: 37722156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, Carabus (Procrustes) coriaceus cerisyi and C. (Morphocarabus) kollari praecellens (Coleoptera: Carabidae) - A geometric morphometric approach.
    Vesović N; Ivanović A; Ćurčić S
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2019 Mar; 49():1-9. PubMed ID: 30710632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specific-age group sex estimation of infants through geometric morphometrics analysis of pubis and ischium.
    Estévez Campo EJ; López-Lázaro S; López-Morago Rodríguez C; Alemán Aguilera I; Botella López MC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():185-192. PubMed ID: 29587219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The torso integration hypothesis revisited in Homo sapiens: Contributions to the understanding of hominin body shape evolution.
    Torres-Tamayo N; García-Martínez D; Nalla S; Barash A; Williams SA; Blanco-Pérez E; Mata Escolano F; Sanchis-Gimeno JA; Bastir M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Dec; 167(4):777-790. PubMed ID: 30259957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual dimorphism in Sturnira lilium (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): can pregnancy and pup carrying be responsible for differences in wing shape?
    de Camargo NF; de Oliveira HF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49734. PubMed ID: 23166759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphometric analyses of sexual dimorphism in sound-emitting structures in adults of the bess beetle Vindex agnoscendus (Coleoptera: Passalidae).
    Ariza-Marín ER; De Luna E
    Zoology (Jena); 2022 Apr; 151():125992. PubMed ID: 35228128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary first premolar shape (and not size) as an indicator of sexual dimorphism: A 2D geomorphometric study.
    Natarajan S; Ahmed J; Jose NP; Shetty S
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():433. PubMed ID: 38481535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification.
    Kranioti EF; Bastir M; Sánchez-Meseguer A; Rosas A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):111.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19446415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional analysis of sexual dimorphism in ribcage kinematics of modern humans.
    García-Martínez D; Bastir M; Torres-Tamayo N; O'Higgins P; Torres-Sánchez I; García-Río F; Heuzé Y
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Jun; 169(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 30934120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex classification using the human sacrum: Geometric morphometrics versus conventional approaches.
    Krenn VA; Webb NM; Fornai C; Haeusler M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0264770. PubMed ID: 35385483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cranial shape variation in mink: Separating two highly similar species.
    Gálvez-López E; Kilbourne B; Cox PG
    J Anat; 2022 Feb; 240(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34569054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and Interspecific Interactions as Proximate Determinants of Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Trajectories in the Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Delphinidae).
    de Francesco MC; Loy A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164287. PubMed ID: 27764133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Geometric Morphometric Study on Sexual Dimorphism in Viscerocranium.
    Toneva D; Nikolova S; Tasheva-Terzieva E; Zlatareva D; Lazarov N
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 36138812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allometry and Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Pelvis.
    Fischer B; Mitteroecker P
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2017 Apr; 300(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 28297185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual dimorphism in the walrus mandible: comparative description and geometric morphometrics.
    Boisville M; Chatar N; Lambert O; Dewaele L
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13940. PubMed ID: 36157061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing thoraco-pelvic covariation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes: A 3D geometric morphometric approach.
    Torres-Tamayo N; Martelli S; Schlager S; García-Martínez D; Sanchis-Gimeno JA; Mata-Escolano F; Nalla S; Ogihara N; Oishi M; Bastir M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Nov; 173(3):514-534. PubMed ID: 32864759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.