These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34796771)

  • 1. Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Guo Z; Yu G; Zhou H; Wang X; Lu Y; Meng Q
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211057367. PubMed ID: 34796771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of web-based audiometry version of HEARZAP.
    P PR; Ramkumar V
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283519. PubMed ID: 36976819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of application-based audiometry for hearing evaluation.
    Lee SY; Seo HW; Jung SM; Lee SH; Chung JH
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7359. PubMed ID: 38548854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration and initial validation of a low-cost computer-based screening audiometer coupled to consumer insert phone-earmuff combination for boothless audiometry.
    Seluakumaran K; Shaharudin MN
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):850-858. PubMed ID: 34455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
    Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
    Storey KK; Muñoz K; Nelson L; Larsen J; White K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Multicenter Validity Study of Four Smartphone Hearing Test Apps in Optimized and Home Environments.
    Swords C; Twumasi E; Fitzgerald M; Fitzsimons-West E; Luo M; Dunne H; Lim KH; Jones O; Law S; Myuran T; Smith G; Tailor BV; Wakelam O; de Cates C; Borsetto D; Tysome J; Donnelly N; Axon P; Bance M; Smith ME
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2864-2870. PubMed ID: 38214403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.
    Clavier OH; Norris JA; Hinckley DW; Martin WH; Lee SY; Soli SD; Brungart DS; Schurman JR; Larsen E; Mehraei G; Quigley TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):601. PubMed ID: 35931498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.