These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34798766)

  • 1. A comparison of supermatrix and supertree methods for multilocus phylogenetics using organismal datasets.
    Janies DA; Studer J; Handelman SK; Linchangco G
    Cladistics; 2013 Oct; 29(5):560-566. PubMed ID: 34798766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods.
    Nguyen N; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 22280525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4987. PubMed ID: 29900080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SuperTriplets: a triplet-based supertree approach to phylogenomics.
    Ranwez V; Criscuolo A; Douzery EJ
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i115-23. PubMed ID: 20529895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.
    Swenson MS; Barbançon F; Warnow T; Linder CR
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 20047664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of HGT on phylogenomic reconstruction methods.
    Lapierre P; Lasek-Nesselquist E; Gogarten JP
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Jan; 15(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 22908214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An application of supertree methods to Mammalian mitogenomic sequences.
    Campbell V; Lapointe FJ
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2010 May; 6():57-71. PubMed ID: 20535231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.
    Kupczok A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 11():205. PubMed ID: 21752249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.
    Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D; Burleigh JG
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():347-56. PubMed ID: 19455229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collecting reliable clades using the Greedy Strict Consensus Merger.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2172. PubMed ID: 27375971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A likelihood look at the supermatrix-supertree controversy.
    Ren F; Tanaka H; Yang Z
    Gene; 2009 Jul; 441(1-2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18502054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Smith SA; Beaulieu JM; Donoghue MJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19210768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient algorithms for knowledge-enhanced supertree and supermatrix phylogenetic problems.
    Wehe A; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1432-41. PubMed ID: 24407302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. L.U.St: a tool for approximated maximum likelihood supertree reconstruction.
    Akanni WA; Creevey CJ; Wilkinson M; Pisani D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 15():183. PubMed ID: 24925766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.