309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34798850)
21. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
Taha D; Sabet A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cementation Protocol for Bonding Zirconia Crowns to Titanium Base CAD/CAM Abutments.
Zahoui A; Bergamo ET; Marun MM; Silva KP; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):527-535. PubMed ID: 32956434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of varying titanium base abutment heights on retention of zirconia restorations: An in vitro study.
Nguyen O; Lee SJ; Lee JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 37633730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the residual cement on custom computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconia abutments: A preliminary cohort study.
Hsu KW; Liang CH; Peng YC; Hsiao CC
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 34521506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Mroczka K; Deeb JG
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31125150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Temporary Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using Titanium Base Abutments: An In Vitro Study on Bonding Stability and Pull-out Forces.
Pitta J; Bijelic-Donova J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Närhi T; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 32956436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments.
Lopes ACO; Machado CM; Bonjardim LR; Bergamo ETP; Ramalho IS; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e552-e556. PubMed ID: 29961986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.
Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components.
Schiessl C; Schaefer L; Winter C; Fuerst J; Rosentritt M; Zeman F; Behr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 May; 17(4):1179-90. PubMed ID: 22847855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro damping and strain distribution for implant-supported crowns using 5 different CAD-CAM crowns and 3 different luting cements.
Sukkasam C; Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):916.e1-916.e9. PubMed ID: 38443240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
