311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34798850)
41. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.
Lennartz A; Dohmen A; Bishti S; Fischer H; Wolfart S
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):740-746. PubMed ID: 29807736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of strains for new generation CAD-CAM implant-supported crowns under loading.
Yilmaz B; Alsaery A; Altintas SH; Schimmel M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 22(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 32253824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. In Vitro Shock Absorption Tests on Implant-Supported Crowns: Influence of Crown Materials and Luting Agents.
Rosentritt M; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M; Preis V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):116–122. PubMed ID: 28518187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Chiam SY; Lee HL; Bedrossian AE; Xu Q; Kuykendall W; Ren A; Hess TA; Ramos V; Chung KH
J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 37203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.
Alseddiek A; Al-Zordk W; Attia A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):784. PubMed ID: 37875871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
Wasiluk G; Chomik E; Gehrke P; Pietruska M; Skurska A; Pietruski J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Using Er:YAG laser to remove lithium disilicate crowns from zirconia implant abutments: An in vitro study.
Deeb JG; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Abdulmajeed A; Grzech-Leśniak K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223924. PubMed ID: 31689289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
