131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3479894)
1. The evaluation of high-speed screen/film combinations in cephalometric radiography.
Kimura K; Langland OE; Biggerstaff RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 3479894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
Hurlburt CE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.
Hurlburt CE; Coggins LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 6584845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
Stirrups DR
Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
McWilliam JS; Welander U
Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance of x-ray-intensifying screens.
Burgess AE; Hicken P
Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 7071362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quantitative evaluation of film-screen combinations for x-ray diagnosis].
Bronder T; Heinze-Assmann R
Phys Med Biol; 1988 May; 33(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 3399512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation].
Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
