These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3479897)

  • 21. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Feb; 87(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 3855607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
    Wellens H
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.
    Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1975 Feb; 67(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 1054214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Zheng ZH; Yamaguchi T; Kurihara A; Li HF; Maki K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24033888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities.
    Jung WS; Kim H; Jeon DM; Mah SJ; Ahn SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1108-15. PubMed ID: 23618835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible: a cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion.
    Davis GS; Cannon JL; Messersmith ML
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(1):22-8; quiz 29-30. PubMed ID: 23909085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anteroposterior skeletofacial classification and its relationship to maxillary second molar buccopalatal angulation.
    Levine TP; Matthews GJ; Salama LA; Yee A
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):851-856. PubMed ID: 33378513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.