These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34799504)

  • 1. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to deep vein thrombosis.
    Qadeer MA; Kelly M; Lenehan B
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2022 Jan; 33(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 34799504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Quality and Readability of Online Resources for Plantar Fasciitis.
    Lim ST; Kelly M; O'Neill S; D'Souza L
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(6):1175-1178. PubMed ID: 34092460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Hanley B; Brown P; O'Neill S; Osborn M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e023804. PubMed ID: 31152026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
    Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
    Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
    World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Sickle Cell Retinopathy for Patients.
    Gbedemah ZEE; Fuseini MN; Fordjuor SKEJ; Baisie-Nkrumah EJ; Beecham REM; Amissah-Arthur KN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 259():45-52. PubMed ID: 37918780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
    Turk Neurosurg; 2024; 34(4):588-599. PubMed ID: 38874237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.