These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34799816)

  • 1. Fine tuning for success in structure-based virtual screening.
    Pihan E; Kotev M; Rabal O; Beato C; Diaz Gonzalez C
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 34799816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Commercially Available Compound Libraries.
    Kireev D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1439():65-76. PubMed ID: 27316988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
    Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast Rescoring Protocols to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performed on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Chaput L; Villoutreix BO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Aug; 60(8):3910-3934. PubMed ID: 32786511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
    Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Kontoyianni M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1647():255-266. PubMed ID: 28809009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein Preparation Automatic Protocol for High-Throughput Inverse Virtual Screening: Accelerating the Target Identification by Computational Methods.
    De Vita S; Lauro G; Ruggiero D; Terracciano S; Riccio R; Bifulco G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4678-4690. PubMed ID: 31593460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.
    Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 26222931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand-based virtual screening approach using a new scoring function.
    Hamza A; Wei NN; Zhan CG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):963-74. PubMed ID: 22486340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual fragment screening: exploration of MM-PBSA re-scoring.
    Kawatkar S; Moustakas D; Miller M; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Aug; 26(8):921-34. PubMed ID: 22869295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ProSelection: A Novel Algorithm to Select Proper Protein Structure Subsets for in Silico Target Identification and Drug Discovery Research.
    Wang N; Wang L; Xie XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2686-2698. PubMed ID: 29016123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.
    Sastry GM; Adzhigirey M; Day T; Annabhimoju R; Sherman W
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2013 Mar; 27(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 23579614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving virtual screening results with MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.
    Sahakyan H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):731-736. PubMed ID: 33983518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.