568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34799852)
1. Application of machine learning classifiers to X-ray diffraction imaging with medically relevant phantoms.
Stryker S; Kapadia AJ; Greenberg JA
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):532-546. PubMed ID: 34799852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A support vector machine classifier reduces interscanner variation in the HRCT classification of regional disease pattern in diffuse lung disease: comparison to a Bayesian classifier.
Chang Y; Lim J; Kim N; Seo JB; Lynch DA
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051912. PubMed ID: 23635282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation based evaluation of a fan beam coded aperture x-ray diffraction imaging system for biospecimen analysis.
Stryker S; Kapadia AJ; Greenberg JA
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065022. PubMed ID: 33601359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of structural brain MRI and multi-parameter classification for Alzheimer's disease.
Zhang Y; Liu S
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2018 Jul; 63(4):427-437. PubMed ID: 28622141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.
Weng WH; Wagholikar KB; McCray AT; Szolovits P; Chueh HC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 29191207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resolution analysis of a volumetric coded aperture X-ray diffraction imaging system.
Gude Z; Kapadia AJ; Greenberg JA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 38578873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of sureness in evaluating AI/CADx: Lesion-based repeatability of machine learning classification performance on breast MRI.
Whitney HM; Drukker K; Vieceli M; Van Dusen A; de Oliveira M; Abe H; Giger ML
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1812-1821. PubMed ID: 37602841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of
Reinartz M; Luckett ES; Schaeverbeke J; De Meyer S; Adamczuk K; Thal DR; Van Laere K; Dupont P; Vandenberghe R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3772-3786. PubMed ID: 35522322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of THz pulse signals using two-dimensional cross-correlation feature extraction and non-linear classifiers.
Siuly ; Yin X; Hadjiloucas S; Zhang Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():64-82. PubMed ID: 27000290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the Role of Image Fusion in Brain Tumor Classification Models Based on Machine Learning Algorithm for Personalized Medicine.
Nanmaran R; Srimathi S; Yamuna G; Thanigaivel S; Vickram AS; Priya AK; Karthick A; Karpagam J; Mohanavel V; Muhibbullah M
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():7137524. PubMed ID: 35178119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade.
Bektas CT; Kocak B; Yardimci AH; Turkcanoglu MH; Yucetas U; Koca SB; Erdim C; Kilickesmez O
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 30167812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation.
Kocak B; Yardimci AH; Bektas CT; Turkcanoglu MH; Erdim C; Yucetas U; Koca SB; Kilickesmez O
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():149-157. PubMed ID: 30292260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiomics machine-learning classifiers and feature selection for differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumour based on 3D computed tomography features.
Yin P; Mao N; Zhao C; Wu J; Sun C; Chen L; Hong N
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1841-1847. PubMed ID: 30280245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Method of sparse-view coded-aperture x-ray diffraction tomography.
Liang K; Zhang L; Xing Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(6):. PubMed ID: 36854183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-Aided Detection of Incidental Lumbar Spine Fractures from Routine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Studies Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier.
Mehta SD; Sebro R
J Digit Imaging; 2020 Feb; 33(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 31062114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
