These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34800985)

  • 1. Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method.
    Cheng C; Spiegelman D; Li F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):253. PubMed ID: 34800985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An exact regression-based approach for the estimation of natural direct and indirect effects with a binary outcome and a continuous mediator.
    Samoilenko M; Lefebvre G
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):353-387. PubMed ID: 36513379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirical evaluation of approximate and exact regression-based causal mediation approaches for a binary outcome and a continuous or a binary mediator for case-control study designs.
    Caubet M; L'Espérance K; Koushik A; Lefebvre G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):72. PubMed ID: 38509513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parametric-Regression-Based Causal Mediation Analysis of Binary Outcomes and Binary Mediators: Moving Beyond the Rareness or Commonness of the Outcome.
    Samoilenko M; Lefebvre G
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 190(9):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 33693467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of adjusting for pure predictors of exposure, mediator, and outcome on the variance of natural direct and indirect effect estimators.
    Diop A; Lefebvre G; Duchaine CS; Laurin D; Talbot D
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(10):2339-2354. PubMed ID: 33650232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models.
    Miočević M; O'Rourke HP; MacKinnon DP; Brown HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):285-301. PubMed ID: 28342072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of bias-adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small-sample longitudinal studies.
    Gosho M; Ishii R; Noma H; Maruo K
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2711-2727. PubMed ID: 37062288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mediation analysis for common binary outcomes.
    Gaynor SM; Schwartz J; Lin X
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):512-529. PubMed ID: 30256434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the Product Method More Efficient Than the Difference Method for Assessing Mediation?
    Cheng C; Spiegelman D; Li F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 192(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 35921210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ORTH.Ord: An R package for analyzing correlated ordinal outcomes using alternating logistic regressions with orthogonalized residuals.
    Meng C; Ryan M; Rathouz PJ; Turner EL; Preisser JS; Li F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jul; 237():107567. PubMed ID: 37207384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples.
    Wang M; Kong L; Li Z; Zhang L
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(10):1706-21. PubMed ID: 26585756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials.
    Ginestet CE; Emsley R; Landau S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1129-1148. PubMed ID: 31172884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of causal mediation effects for a dichotomous outcome in multiple-mediator models using the mediation formula.
    Wang W; Nelson S; Albert JM
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(24):4211-28. PubMed ID: 23650048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.