These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

635 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34801504)

  • 1. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
    Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates.
    Múrria C; Wangensteen OS; Somma S; Väisänen L; Fortuño P; Arnedo MA; Prat N
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 935():173243. PubMed ID: 38761946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing benthic macroinvertebrate communities' spatial heterogeneity in Mediterranean transitional waters through eDNA metabarcoding.
    Pinna M; Zangaro F; Specchia V
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):17890. PubMed ID: 39095544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
    Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
    Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advances in environmental DNA monitoring: standardization, automation, and emerging technologies in aquatic ecosystems.
    Lu S; Zeng H; Xiong F; Yao M; He S
    Sci China Life Sci; 2024 Jul; 67(7):1368-1384. PubMed ID: 38512561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.
    Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy).
    Cordier T; Frontalini F; Cermakova K; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Treglia M; Scantamburlo E; Bonamin V; Pawlowski J
    Mar Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 146():24-34. PubMed ID: 30890270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
    Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental RNA outperforms eDNA metabarcoding in assessing impact of marine pollution: A chromium-spiked mesocosm test.
    Greco M; Lejzerowicz F; Reo E; Caruso A; Maccotta A; Coccioni R; Pawlowski J; Frontalini F
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134239. PubMed ID: 35292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
    Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing waterborne eDNA capture from waterholes in savanna systems under remote field conditions.
    Schenekar T; Baxter J; Phukuntsi MA; Sedlmayr I; Weckworth B; Mwale M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13942. PubMed ID: 38390664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses of foraminifera communities to aquaculture-derived organic enrichment as revealed by environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    He X; Sutherland TF; Pawlowski J; Abbott CL
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(5):1138-1153. PubMed ID: 30614581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taxonomic and abundance biases affect the record of marine eukaryotic plankton communities in sediment DNA archives.
    Nguyen NL; Pawłowska J; Zajaczkowski M; Weiner AKM; Cordier T; Grant DM; De Schepper S; Pawłowski J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Nov; 24(8):e14014. PubMed ID: 39188124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.