These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34801576)

  • 1. Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
    Obradovic D; Freund A; Feistritzer HJ; Sulimov D; Loncar G; Abdel-Wahab M; Zeymer U; Desch S; Thiele H
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2021; 69():35-46. PubMed ID: 34801576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
    Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Escalating and De-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
    Geller BJ; Sinha SS; Kapur NK; Bakitas M; Balsam LB; Chikwe J; Klein DG; Kochar A; Masri SC; Sims DB; Wong GC; Katz JN; van Diepen S;
    Circulation; 2022 Aug; 146(6):e50-e68. PubMed ID: 35862152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.
    Varshney AS; Berg DD; Katz JN; Baird-Zars VM; Bohula EA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Guo J; Lawler PR; Nativi-Nicolau J; Sinha SS; Teuteberg JJ; van Diepen S; Morrow DA;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 5(6):703-708. PubMed ID: 32293644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Rab T; O'Neill W
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Oct; 29(7):410-417. PubMed ID: 30573276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Miller PE; Solomon MA; McAreavey D
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1922-1929. PubMed ID: 28857849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.
    Lang CN; Kaier K; Zotzmann V; Stachon P; Pottgiesser T; von Zur Muehlen C; Zehender M; Duerschmied D; Schmid B; Bode C; Wengenmayer T; Staudacher DL
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 33258007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Challenges and importance of randomized control trials.
    Basir MB; Pinto DS; Ziaeian B; Khandelwal A; Cowger J; Suh W; Althouse A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Dec; 98(7):1264-1274. PubMed ID: 33682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
    Pahuja M; Yerasi C; Lam PH; Hashim H; Ben-Dor I; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Sheikh FH; Najjar SS; Molina EJ; Waksman R
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):213-227. PubMed ID: 36847990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices: updates from recent studies.
    Marbach JA; Chweich H; Miyashita S; Kapur NK
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 36(4):375-383. PubMed ID: 33990478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race.
    Kim Y; Park J; Essa M; Lansky AJ; Sugeng L
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 125(12):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 32471549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.
    Zhang Q; Han Y; Sun S; Zhang C; Liu H; Wang B; Wei S
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35152887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.