These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34801752)
21. Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Jitpakdee K; Sommer F; Gouveia E; Mykolajtchuk C; Boadi B; Berger J; Hussain I; Härtl R J Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 10(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 38567017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Tan LA; Rivera J; Tan XA; Le VP; Khoo LT; Berven SH Int J Spine Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(s3):S39-S44. PubMed ID: 33122185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF Intraoperative Implants in Patients with Osteoporosis. Li Y; Liu S; He Z; Yu S Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():2565391. PubMed ID: 35265168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes? Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Morphologic Changes of Intervertebral Foramen After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Radiographic and Clinical Study. Liu W; Zhao Y; Jia J; Chen X; Mai R; Yuan S; Tian Y; Liu X World Neurosurg; 2020 Oct; 142():e151-e159. PubMed ID: 32599187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels]. Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1. Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique. Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings. Isaacs RE; Sembrano JN; Tohmeh AG; Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S133-44. PubMed ID: 26839992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part I: 2-Dimensional Operative Video and Technical Report. Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Stecher P; Dorward I; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Oct; 19(5):E473-E479. PubMed ID: 32433755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population. Sim DS; Kasivishvanaath A; Jiang L; Cheong Soh RC; Ling ZM Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):520-525. PubMed ID: 37076255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up. Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes. Kim JS; Jung B; Lee SH Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Jul; 31(6):E302-E309. PubMed ID: 23027364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]