These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34803638)

  • 21. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Action-induced adjustment of prediction explains no visual mismatch negativity to self-generated deviants.
    Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facial Expression Related vMMN: Disentangling Emotional from Neutral Change Detection.
    Kovarski K; Latinus M; Charpentier J; Cléry H; Roux S; Houy-Durand E; Saby A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Batty M; Gomot M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():18. PubMed ID: 28194102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual mismatch negativity reveals automatic detection of sequential regularity violation.
    Stefanics G; Kimura M; Czigler I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():46. PubMed ID: 21629766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential Effects of Awareness and Task Relevance on Early and Late ERPs in a No-Report Visual Oddball Paradigm.
    Schlossmacher I; Dellert T; Pitts M; Bruchmann M; Straube T
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(14):2906-2913. PubMed ID: 32122954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automatic detection of violations of statistical regularities in the periphery is affected by the focus of spatial attention: A visual mismatch negativity study.
    File D; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 May; 49(10):1348-1356. PubMed ID: 30554438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by semantic violations in visual words.
    Hu A; Gu F; Wong LLN; Tong X; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 1746():147010. PubMed ID: 32663455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Light up and see: enhancement of the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) by nicotine.
    Fisher DJ; Scott TL; Shah DK; Prise S; Thompson M; Knott VJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 1313():162-71. PubMed ID: 20006592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Asymmetric effect of automatic deviant detection: The effect of familiarity in visual mismatch negativity.
    Sulykos I; Kecskés-Kovács K; Czigler I
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():108-17. PubMed ID: 25724142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic change detection: Mismatch negativity and the now-classic Rensink, O'Reagan, and Clark (1997) stimuli.
    File D; Petro B; Gaál ZA; Csikós N; Czigler I
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():975714. PubMed ID: 36092095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The visual mismatch negativity elicited with visual speech stimuli.
    Files BT; Auer ET; Bernstein LE
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():371. PubMed ID: 23882205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders.
    Kremláček J; Kreegipuu K; Tales A; Astikainen P; Põldver N; Näätänen R; Stefanics G
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():76-112. PubMed ID: 27174389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hunger enhances automatic processing of food and non-food stimuli: A visual mismatch negativity study.
    Sultson H; Vainik U; Kreegipuu K
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():324-336. PubMed ID: 30508611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unattended and attended visual change detection of motion as indexed by event-related potentials and its behavioral correlates.
    Kuldkepp N; Kreegipuu K; Raidvee A; Näätänen R; Allik J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():476. PubMed ID: 23966932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does surprise enhancement or repetition suppression explain visual mismatch negativity?
    Amado C; Kovács G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 43(12):1590-600. PubMed ID: 27108896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category.
    Kecskés-Kovács K; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 37(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 23167956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic detection of trustworthiness of the face: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Kovács-Bálint Z; Stefanics G; Trunk A; Hernádi I
    Acta Biol Hung; 2014 Mar; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty.
    Kremláček J; Kuba M; Kubová Z; Langrová J; Szanyi J; Vít F; Bednář M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():411. PubMed ID: 23908621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Binocular rivalry and emotion: Implications for neural correlates of consciousness and emotional biases in conscious perception.
    Hernández-Lorca M; Sandberg K; Kessel D; Fernández-Folgueiras U; Overgaard M; Carretié L
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():539-555. PubMed ID: 31521914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?
    Flynn M; Liasis A; Gardner M; Boyd S; Towell T
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 19551375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.