These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34805121)

  • 1. From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles.
    von Arx M; Liechti M; Connolly L; Bangerter C; Meier ML; Schmid S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():769117. PubMed ID: 34805121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
    Dehghan P; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.
    Dreischarf M; Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 26603872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional video recordings dependably quantify whole-body lifting strategy using the Stoop-Squat-Index: A methods comparison against motion capture and a reliability study.
    Bangerter C; Faude O; Eichelberger P; Schwarzentrub A; Girardin M; Busch A; Hasler CC; Schmid S
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111975. PubMed ID: 38320342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in lifting kinematics related to individual intrinsic lumbar curvature: an investigation in healthy adults.
    Pavlova AV; Meakin JR; Cooper K; Barr RJ; Aspden RM
    BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2018; 4(1):e000374. PubMed ID: 30057776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intervertebral disc deformation in the lower lumbar spine during object lifting measured in vivo using indwelling bone pins.
    Schmid S; Kramers-de Quervain I; Baumgartner W
    J Biomech; 2024 Nov; 176():112352. PubMed ID: 39357342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of lumbar spine loads and kinematics in healthy and non-specific low back pain individuals during unstable lifting activities.
    Heidari E; Arjmand N; Kahrizi S
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111344. PubMed ID: 36270086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Stoop-Squat-Index: a simple but powerful measure for quantifying whole-body lifting behavior.
    Schmid S
    Arch Physiother; 2022 Apr; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 35449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting.
    Hwang S; Kim Y; Kim Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 19183507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 15863086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal stability and role of passive stiffness in dynamic squat and stoop lifts.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Oct; 10(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 17852177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lifting Techniques: Why Are We Not Using Evidence To Optimize Movement?
    Washmuth NB; McAfee AD; Bickel CS
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2022; 17(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 35024210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
    Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of changes in the lumbar posture in lifting on trunk muscle and spinal loads: A combined in vivo, musculoskeletal, and finite element model study.
    Khoddam-Khorasani P; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 104():109728. PubMed ID: 32147242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo load on knee, hip and spine during manual materials handling with two lifting techniques.
    Bender A; Schmidt H; Wellner DL; Duda GN; Brandl C; Damm P
    J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111963. PubMed ID: 38286711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a soft active back support exosuit on trunk motion and thoracolumbar spine loading during squat and stoop lifts.
    Banks JJ; Quirk DA; Chung J; Cherin JM; Walsh CJ; Anderson DE
    Ergonomics; 2024 Feb; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38389220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.