These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3480566)

  • 41. A multiscale algorithm for segmenting calcifications from high-resolution mammographic specimen radiographs.
    Näppi J; Dean PB
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):130-2. PubMed ID: 10847381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wide Web.
    Yuasa H; Ariji Y; Ohki M; Naitoh M; Shiojima M; Ushida M; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jul; 88(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 10442952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radiographic evaluation of implant-obscured bone. Comparison of digitally subtracted tomographic and periapical techniques.
    Ludlow JB; Gates W; Nason R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7489280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of region of interest outline variations on gray-scale frequency distributions for alveolar bone.
    Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 May; 75(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 8488032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Evaluation of the perceptional performance of high resolution flat panel displays].
    Araki Y; Sanada S; Kobayashi T; Hashimoto N; Funabasama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 61(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 16132034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation by digital subtraction radiography of induced changes in the bone density of the female rat mandible.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):438-44. PubMed ID: 19033428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of a computer-aided detection system to detect missed lung cancer at chest radiography.
    White CS; Flukinger T; Jeudy J; Chen JJ
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 19561261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
    Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Performance for obtaining maximal gain from a program for digital subtraction radiography.
    Aagaard E; Donslund C; Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Apr; 99(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 2052898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 2052339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Brief communication: Bone trabeculae are visible on periapical images.
    Colosi D; Potluri A; Islam S; Geha H; Lurie A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Dec; 96(6):772-3. PubMed ID: 14676771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative investigation of subjective image quality of digital intraoral radiographs processed with 3 image-processing algorithms.
    Li G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jun; 97(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 15184861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of reliability of manual and computer-intensive methods for radiodensity measures of alveolar bone loss.
    Hildebolt CF; Brunsden B; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Pilgram TK; Townsend KE; Vannier MW; Shrout MK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9780904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of angular measurements and assessment of distortion in the mandibular third molar region on panoramic radiographs.
    Dudhia R; Monsour PA; Savage NW; Wilson RJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Apr; 111(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 21420643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison between inverted and unprocessed digitized radiographic imaging in periodontal bone loss measurements.
    Scaf G; Morihisa O; Loffredo Lde C
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2007 Dec; 15(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 19089186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.