These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34806210)

  • 1. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model.
    Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exposure assessment for Cox proportional hazards cure models with interval-censored survival data.
    Wang W; Cong N; Ye A; Zhang H; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2022 Jan; 64(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 34378243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.
    Bolard P; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Esteve J; Giorgi R; Chadha-Boreham H; Binquet C; Faivre J
    J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 12665210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation in Cox regression when there are time-varying effects of covariates.
    Keogh RH; Morris TP
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3661-3678. PubMed ID: 30014575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal Mediation Analysis for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with a Smooth Baseline Hazard Estimator.
    Wang W; Albert JM
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2017 Aug; 66(4):741-757. PubMed ID: 28943662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.
    Noorkojuri H; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani A; Pourhoseingholi M
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Feb; 15(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 23682331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials.
    Kahan BC; Rushton H; Morris TP; Daniel RM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():42. PubMed ID: 27068456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The restricted cubic spline as baseline hazard in the proportional hazards model with step function time-dependent covariables.
    Herndon JE; Harrell FE
    Stat Med; 1995 Oct; 14(19):2119-29. PubMed ID: 8552891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new proposal for multivariable modelling of time-varying effects in survival data based on fractional polynomial time-transformation.
    Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Look M
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):453-73. PubMed ID: 17623349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions.
    Hess KR
    Stat Med; 1994 May; 13(10):1045-62. PubMed ID: 8073200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Alternative Network Meta-Analysis Methods in the Presence of Nonproportional Hazards: A Case Study in First-Line Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Cope S; Chan K; Campbell H; Chen J; Borrill J; May JR; Malcolm W; Branchoux S; Kupas K; Jansen JP
    Value Health; 2023 Apr; 26(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 36503035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival estimation through the cumulative hazard with monotone natural cubic splines using convex optimization-the HCNS approach.
    Bantis LE; Tsimikas JV; Georgiou SD
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jul; 190():105357. PubMed ID: 32036203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian analysis for partly linear Cox model with measurement error and time-varying covariate effect.
    Pan A; Song X; Huang H
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(23):4666-4681. PubMed ID: 35899596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of restricted cube spline in cox regression model].
    Wei Y; Zhou JH; Zhang ZW; Tan QY; Zhang MY; Li J; Shi XM; Lyu YB
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 54(10):1169-1173. PubMed ID: 32842720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic Cox modelling based on fractional polynomials: time-variations in gastric cancer prognosis.
    Berger U; Schäfer J; Ulm K
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1163-80. PubMed ID: 12652560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.
    Royston P; Parmar MK
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2175-97. PubMed ID: 12210632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A special case of reduced rank models for identification and modelling of time varying effects in survival analysis.
    Perperoglou A
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(28):5135-5148. PubMed ID: 27619730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions.
    Heinzl H; Kaider A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Nov; 54(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 9421665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review.
    Kuitunen I; Ponkilainen VT; Uimonen MM; Eskelinen A; Reito A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):489. PubMed ID: 34049528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cox regression can be collapsible and Aalen regression can be non-collapsible.
    Samuelsen SO
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2023 Apr; 29(2):403-419. PubMed ID: 36271175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.