These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34806210)

  • 21. Flexible extension of the accelerated failure time model to account for nonlinear and time-dependent effects of covariates on the hazard.
    Pang M; Platt RW; Schuster T; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2526-2542. PubMed ID: 34547928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.
    Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2831-45. PubMed ID: 16158396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using fractional polynomials to model the effect of cumulative duration of exposure on outcomes: applications to cohort and nested case-control designs.
    Austin PC; Park-Wyllie LY; Juurlink DN
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):819-29. PubMed ID: 24664670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Network meta-analysis of survival data with fractional polynomials.
    Jansen JP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():61. PubMed ID: 21548941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of random survival forests in understanding the determinants of under-five child mortality in Uganda in the presence of covariates that satisfy the proportional and non-proportional hazards assumption.
    Nasejje JB; Mwambi H
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Sep; 10(1):459. PubMed ID: 28882171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology--with an emphasis on fractional polynomials.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 16342923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing interactions of binary time-dependent covariates with time in cox proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions.
    Heinzl H; Kaider A; Zlabinger G
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2589-601. PubMed ID: 8961465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parsimonious analysis of time-dependent effects in the Cox model.
    Lehr S; Schemper M
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2686-98. PubMed ID: 17094129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival estimation through the cumulative hazard function with monotone natural cubic splines.
    Bantis LE; Tsimikas JV; Georgiou SD
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2012 Jul; 18(3):364-96. PubMed ID: 22399231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada.
    Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?
    Rauch G; Brannath W; Brückner M; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):89-100. PubMed ID: 29719915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sequential tests for non-proportional hazards data.
    Brückner M; Brannath W
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jul; 23(3):339-352. PubMed ID: 26969674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A flexible approach to time-varying coefficients in the Cox regression setting.
    Sargent DJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1997; 3(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 9384623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regression splines for threshold selection in survival data analysis.
    Molinari N; Daurès JP; Durand JF
    Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 11169599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Fitting the Nonlinear Effect of Covariate in Cox Models.
    Roshani D; Ghaderi E
    Acta Inform Med; 2016 Feb; 24(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 27041809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.
    Fisher LD; Lin DY
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1999; 20():145-57. PubMed ID: 10352854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proportional hazards modeling of saccadic response times during reading.
    Nilsson M; Nivre J
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):541-63. PubMed ID: 23744668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time-varying covariates and coefficients in Cox regression models.
    Zhang Z; Reinikainen J; Adeleke KA; Pieterse ME; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Apr; 6(7):121. PubMed ID: 29955581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The comparison of alternative smoothing methods for fitting non-linear exposure-response relationships with Cox models in a simulation study.
    Govindarajulu US; Malloy EJ; Ganguli B; Spiegelman D; Eisen EA
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Jan; 5(1):Article 2. PubMed ID: 20231865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian regularization for flexible baseline hazard functions in Cox survival models.
    Lázaro E; Armero C; Alvares D
    Biom J; 2021 Jan; 63(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 32885493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.