230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34807269)
1. What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?
Ghadimi M; Birnbaum J; Kamel IR; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3327-3333. PubMed ID: 34807269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging.
Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Berman J; Fruitman KC; Kobi M; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
Liver Transpl; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 31344753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection.
Li L; Zheng W; Wang J; Han J; Guo Z; Hu Y; Li X; Zhou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):434-443. PubMed ID: 35441534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen J; Kuang S; Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Zhang L; Rong D; He B; Deng Y; Xiao Y; Shi W; Fowler K; Wang J; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1530-1542. PubMed ID: 33040166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRI.
Lee SM; Lee JM; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Yang HK; Yoon JH
Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):655-663. PubMed ID: 31310175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients.
Li L; Mao S; Wang J; Zheng W; Shen J; Clevert DA; Zhou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 May; 220(5):682-691. PubMed ID: 36382914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical analysis of major and ancillary features of LI-RADS v2018 in the differentiation of small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
De Gaetano AM; Catalano M; Pompili M; Marini MG; Rodríguez Carnero P; Gullì C; Infante A; Iezzi R; Ponziani FR; Cerrito L; Marrone G; Giuliante F; Ardito F; Rapaccini GL; Vecchio FM; Giraldi L; Manfredi R;
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(18):7786-7801. PubMed ID: 31599447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI.
Ko A; Park HJ; Lee ES; Park SB; Kim YK; Choi SY; Ahn S
Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):319.e1-319.e9. PubMed ID: 31858990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of threshold growth as a major feature on LI-RADS categorization.
Chernyak V; Kobi M; Flusberg M; Fruitman KC; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2089-2100. PubMed ID: 28352950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
Xie S; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jiang T; Liu W; Rong D; Sun L; Zhang L; He B; Wang J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Feb; 47(2):596-607. PubMed ID: 34773467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term evolution of LR-2, LR-3 and LR-4 observations in HBV-related cirrhosis based on LI-RADS v2018 using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Xing F; Zhang T; Miao X; Lu J; Du S; Jiang J; Xing W
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Dec; 48(12):3703-3713. PubMed ID: 37740759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LI-RADS: Diagnostic Performance of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointensity and Major Imaging Features of LR-3 and LR-4 Lesions Measuring 10-19 mm With Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement.
Vernuccio F; Cannella R; Meyer M; Choudhoury KR; Gonzáles F; Schwartz FR; Gupta RT; Bashir MR; Furlan A; Marin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W57-W65. PubMed ID: 31039012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Shahbazian H; Birnbaum J; Burns PJ; Shabanan SH; Kanmaniraja D; Reinus J; Kamel I; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Dec; 48(12):3696-3702. PubMed ID: 37725110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modifying LI-RADS on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Observational Study.
Jiang H; Song B; Qin Y; Konanur M; Wu Y; McInnes MDF; Lafata KJ; Bashir MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Aug; 56(2):399-412. PubMed ID: 34994029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathological considerations of CEUS LI-RADS: correlation with fibrosis stage and tumour histological grade.
Cheng MQ; Hu HT; Huang H; Pan JM; Xian MF; Huang Y; Kuang M; Xie XY; Li W; Wang W; Lu MD
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5680-5688. PubMed ID: 33502556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: Diagnostic performance of category-adjusted LR-5 using modified criteria.
Park JH; Chung YE; Seo N; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242344. PubMed ID: 33186378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
