These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34807359)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) in Identifying Active Females Who are Prone to Injury. A Systematic Review.
    Asgari M; Alizadeh S; Sendt A; Jaitner T
    Sports Med Open; 2021 Nov; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 34807359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an Injury Prediction Tool Among Active Adult Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Dorrel BS; Long T; Shaffer S; Myer GD
    Sports Health; 2015; 7(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 26502447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Influencing the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk in Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Moore E; Chalmers S; Milanese S; Fuller JT
    Sports Med; 2019 Sep; 49(9):1449-1463. PubMed ID: 31104227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Moran RW; Schneiders AG; Mason J; Sullivan SJ
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 51(23):1661-1669. PubMed ID: 28360142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability, Validity, and Injury Predictive Value of the Functional Movement Screen: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bonazza NA; Smuin D; Onks CA; Silvis ML; Dhawan A
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):725-732. PubMed ID: 27159297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen and a Novel Basketball Mobility Test as an Injury Prediction Tool for Collegiate Basketball Players.
    Bond CW; Dorman JC; Odney TO; Roggenbuck SJ; Young SW; Munce TA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1589-1600. PubMed ID: 28426513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes.
    Dorrel B; Long T; Shaffer S; Myer GD
    J Athl Train; 2018 Jan; 53(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29251533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do Normative Composite Scores on the Functional Movement Screen Differ Across High School, Collegiate, and Professional Athletes? A Critical Review.
    Pollen TR; Keitt F; Trojian TH
    Clin J Sport Med; 2021 Jan; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 30339631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.
    Moran RW; Schneiders AG; Major KM; Sullivan SJ
    Br J Sports Med; 2016 May; 50(9):527-36. PubMed ID: 26316583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is a low Functional Movement Screen score (≤14/21) associated with injuries in sport? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Trinidad-Fernandez M; Gonzalez-Sanchez M; Cuesta-Vargas AI
    BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2019; 5(1):e000501. PubMed ID: 31673399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players.
    Lee CL; Hsu MC; Chang WD; Wang SC; Chen CY; Chou PH; Chang NJ
    J Exerc Sci Fit; 2018 Aug; 16(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 30662496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives.
    Warren M; Lininger MR; Chimera NJ; Smith CA
    Open Access J Sports Med; 2018; 9():171-182. PubMed ID: 30233259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk: Association and Predictive Value in Active Men.
    Bushman TT; Grier TL; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; North WJ; Jones BH
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 26657573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective Interventions for Improving Functional Movement Screen Scores Among "High-Risk" Athletes: A Systematic Review.
    Clark SC; Rowe ND; Adnan M; Brown SM; Mulcahey MK
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2022; 17(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 35136681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the measurement and predictive validity of the Functional Movement Screen.
    Philp F; Blana D; Chadwick EK; Stewart C; Stapleton C; Major K; Pandyan AD
    BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2018; 4(1):e000357. PubMed ID: 29765700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
    Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity and reliability of the four square step test in different adult populations: a systematic review.
    Moore M; Barker K
    Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 6(1):187. PubMed ID: 28893312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive Validity of a Functional Movement Screen in Professional Basketball Players.
    Hoover DL; Killian CB; Tinius RA; Bellar DM; Wilkinson SG; Esslinger FT; Judge LW
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 33371366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional Movement Screening Performance of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Athletes From Brazil: Differences Considering Practice Time and Combat Style.
    Del Vecchio FB; Gondim DF; Arruda AC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Aug; 30(8):2341-7. PubMed ID: 26808855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population.
    Schneiders AG; Davidsson A; Hörman E; Sullivan SJ
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Jun; 6(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 21713227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.