199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34807485)
1. Effects of the 2012 and 2018 US preventive services task force prostate cancer screening guidelines on pathologic outcomes after prostatectomy.
Plambeck BD; Wang LL; Mcgirr S; Jiang J; Van Leeuwen BJ; Lagrange CA; Boyle SL
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 34807485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: a decade of experience.
Seetharam Bhat KR; Moschovas MC; Onol FF; Sandri M; Rogers T; Roof S; Rocco B; Patel VR
BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):884-892. PubMed ID: 32173990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.
Gaylis FD; Choi JE; Hamilton Z; Dato P; Cohen E; Calabrese R; Prime H; Rosenbaum A; Kader AK
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):663.e1-663.e7. PubMed ID: 28736250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Lymphovascular Invasion on Overall Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy: Stage-per-Stage Analysis.
Jamil M; Rakic N; Sood A; Keeley J; Modonutti D; Novara G; Jeong W; Menon M; Rogers CG; Abdollah F
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Oct; 19(5):e319-e325. PubMed ID: 34154946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.
Kearns JT; Holt SK; Wright JL; Lin DW; Lange PH; Gore JL
Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(13):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 29781117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.
Beck V; Schlenker B; Herlemann A; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Gratzke C; Stief CG; Tritschler S
World J Urol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):1103-1109. PubMed ID: 30225798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
; Grossman DC; Curry SJ; Owens DK; Bibbins-Domingo K; Caughey AB; Davidson KW; Doubeni CA; Ebell M; Epling JW; Kemper AR; Krist AH; Kubik M; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Silverstein M; Simon MA; Siu AL; Tseng CW
JAMA; 2018 May; 319(18):1901-1913. PubMed ID: 29801017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National Trends in Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Volumes Following the US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening.
Halpern JA; Shoag JE; Artis AS; Ballman KV; Sedrakyan A; Hershman DL; Wright JD; Shih YC; Hu JC
JAMA Surg; 2017 Feb; 152(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 27806151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse stage migration patterns in North American patients undergoing local prostate cancer treatment: a contemporary population-based update in light of the 2012 USPSTF recommendations.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Karakiewicz PI; Pompe RS; Preisser F; Zaffuto E; Dell'Oglio P; Briganti A; Nafez O; Fisch M; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
World J Urol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 29992380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.
Gejerman G; Ciccone P; Goldstein M; Lanteri V; Schlecker B; Sanzone J; Esposito M; Rome S; Ciccone M; Margolis E; Simon R; Guo Y; Pentakota SR; Sadeghi-Nejad H
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):423-428. PubMed ID: 29124241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing clinical trends in 10 000 robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy patients and impact of the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force's statement against PSA screening.
Onol FF; P Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Palmer K; Coughlin G; Samavedi S; Coelho R; Jenson C; Sandri M; Rocco B; Patel V
BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 31301265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative characteristics of men with unfavorable high-Gleason prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Lin BM; Mullins JK; Hyndman ME; Schaeffer EM; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 21664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Associations of pretreatment serum total testosterone measurements with pathology-detected Gleason score cancer.
Porcaro AB; Petrozziello A; Ghimenton C; Migliorini F; Sava T; Caruso B; Romano M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2014; 93(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 24334919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
Zakaria AS; Dragomir A; Brimo F; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Aprikian A
BMC Urol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 30126402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance and biopsy characteristics of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion on radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Kristiansen A; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Franck Lissbrant I; Stattin P; Egevad L
Pathology; 2017 Dec; 49(7):715-720. PubMed ID: 29037803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gontero P; Abdollah F; Passoni NM; Tombal B; Marchioro G; Kneitz B; Walz J; Frohneberg D; Bangma CH; Graefen M; Tizzani A; Frea B; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 22153925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
