These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34807721)

  • 1. Summary for Patients: The Cost-Effectiveness of Mammogram Screening After Age 75 Years.
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jan; 175(1):I16. PubMed ID: 34807721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
    de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.
    Rosenquist CJ; Lindfors KK
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):647-50. PubMed ID: 8184041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years.
    Xu W; Vnenchak P; Smucny J
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Mar; 49(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10735487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation of begin and end ages for mammography screening.
    Carter KJ; Castro F; Kessler E; Erickson BA
    J Healthc Qual; 2005; 27(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 16416891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Definitions of cost, benefit divide breast cancer researchers.
    Lowers J
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1997 Dec; 9(11):15. PubMed ID: 10176023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial.
    Harrison RV; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Chernew M; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF
    Med Care; 2003 Mar; 41(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 12618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
    Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
    Ernster VL
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing the use of mammography: effectiveness and cost.
    Rimer BK; Lipscomb J
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 11185331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing costs and benefits of mammography screening in the workplace.
    Eley JW
    AAOHN J; 1989 May; 37(5):171-7. PubMed ID: 2496692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading in digital mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Posso M; Puig T; Carles M; Rué M; Canelo-Aybar C; Bonfill X
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():40-49. PubMed ID: 29103474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast care imaging: ghost of past?
    Emahiser LJ; Wood BD
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 22461349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
    Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
    Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of mammography in women older than 65 years of age.
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):I34. PubMed ID: 14623641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
    White E; Urban N; Taylor V
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1630-2. PubMed ID: 11036103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.