These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34811633)

  • 1. No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.
    Talipski LA; Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1845-1857. PubMed ID: 34811633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing.
    Dobkins KR; Bosworth RG
    Vision Res; 2001 May; 41(12):1501-17. PubMed ID: 11343718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which way is which? Examining global/local processing with symbolic cues.
    Mills M; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1429-36. PubMed ID: 24684258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues.
    Hoofs V; Grahek I; Boehler CN; Krebs RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):655-670. PubMed ID: 34964093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence from partially valid cueing that words are processed serially.
    Johnson M; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1539-1548. PubMed ID: 36547819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention relieves visual crowding: Dissociable effects of peripheral and central cues.
    Gong M; Liu T; Liu X; Huangfu B; Geng F
    J Vis; 2023 May; 23(5):9. PubMed ID: 37163245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The early attentional pancake: Minimal selection in depth for rapid attentional cueing.
    O'Donnell RE; Murawski KH; Herrmann E; Wisch J; Sullivan GD; Wyble B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 35799043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: evidence for a priority accumulation framework.
    Darnell M; Lamy D
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jul; 86(5):1547-1564. PubMed ID: 34613479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional effects of peripheral cueing as revealed by two event-related potential studies.
    Fu S; Fan S; Chen L; Zhuo Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):172-85. PubMed ID: 11137676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cue from the unconscious - masked symbols prompt spatial anticipation.
    Reuss H; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Wühr P
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():397. PubMed ID: 23091466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion processing impaired by transient spatial attention: Potential implications for the magnocellular pathway.
    Pavan A; Koc Yilmaz S; Kafaligonul H; Battaglini L; Blurton SP
    Vision Res; 2022 Oct; 199():108080. PubMed ID: 35749832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elements of exogenous attentional cueing preserved during optokinetic motion of the visual scene.
    Mastropasqua A; Vural G; Taylor PCJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 55(3):746-761. PubMed ID: 34964525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Textures shape the attentional focus: evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1644-66. PubMed ID: 23943497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial and feature-based effects of exogenous cueing on visual motion processing.
    Busse L; Katzner S; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2019-27. PubMed ID: 16476463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arrow-elicited cueing effects at short intervals: Rapid attentional orienting or cue-target stimulus conflict?
    Green JJ; Woldorff MG
    Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 21975079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Awareness-Dependent Normalization Framework of Visual Bottom-up Attention.
    Wang S; Huang L; Chen Q; Wang J; Xu S; Zhang X
    J Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 41(46):9593-9607. PubMed ID: 34611027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.