These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Comparison of outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches for multi-vessel coronary revascularization]. Zhang LF; Ling YP; Yang H; Gong YC; Song ZM; Wan F Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Dec; 49(6):1066-1070. PubMed ID: 29263483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Review and Current Evidence. Kiaii B; Teefy P Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):394-404. PubMed ID: 31500492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Guan Z; Zhang Z; Gu K; Wang H; Lin J; Zhou W; Wan F Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Dec; 22(6):E493-E502. PubMed ID: 31895036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation]. Yang M; Gao C; Liu S; Wu Y; Xiao C; Wang R Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1166-9. PubMed ID: 26277515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of coronary artery disease]. Shi DM; Han HY Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 58(5):341-344. PubMed ID: 32392999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robotic-assisted hybrid coronary revascularization program: Establishment and early experience in the Middle East. Aluthman U; Bafageeh SW; Ashour MA; Barnawi HI; Bogis AA; Alamri R; Elmahrouk AF; AlGhamdi SA; Ismaeil N; Shihata M; Jamjoom AA J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4783-4789. PubMed ID: 36349707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid coronary revascularization: are we there yet? McKiernan M; Halkos ME Curr Opin Cardiol; 2020 Nov; 35(6):673-678. PubMed ID: 32852342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and angiographic results after hybrid coronary revascularization. Halkos ME; Walker PF; Vassiliades TA; Douglas JS; Devireddy C; Guyton RA; Finn AV; Rab ST; Puskas JD; Liberman HA Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 97(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 24140212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Moreno PR; Stone GW; Gonzalez-Lengua CA; Puskas JD J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 76(3):321-333. PubMed ID: 32674795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the state of hybrid coronary revascularization in 2018? Yanagawa B; Hong K; Cheema A; Bagai A; Verma S Curr Opin Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 33(5):540-545. PubMed ID: 29994806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patients. Harskamp RE; Bagai A; Halkos ME; Rao SV; Bachinsky WB; Patel MR; de Winter RJ; Peterson ED; Alexander JH; Lopes RD Am Heart J; 2014 Apr; 167(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 24655709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]