These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34811922)
1. Opportunities and barriers for the use of Australian cancer registries as platforms for randomized clinical trials. Yan MK; Adler NR; Heriot N; Shang C; Zalcberg JR; Evans S; Wolfe R; Mar VJ Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2022 Aug; 18(4):344-352. PubMed ID: 34811922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Nothing to lose and the possibility of gaining": a qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of registry-based randomised controlled trials among cancer patients and clinicians. Prang KH; Karanatsios B; Zhang A; Verbunt E; Wong HL; Wong V; Gately L; Tran B; Gibbs P; Kelaher M Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):92. PubMed ID: 36747274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paper II: thematic framework analysis of registry-based randomized controlled trials provided insights for designing trial ready registries. Krause KR; Tay J; Douglas WA; Sammy A; Baba A; Goren K; Thombs BD; Howie AH; Oskoui M; Frøbert O; Trakadis Y; Little J; Potter BK; Butcher NJ; Offringa M J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():330-343. PubMed ID: 37146660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining key design elements of registry-based randomised controlled trials: a scoping review. Karanatsios B; Prang KH; Verbunt E; Yeung JM; Kelaher M; Gibbs P Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):552. PubMed ID: 32571382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials. Mathes T; Buehn S; Prengel P; Pieper D J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():120-127. PubMed ID: 28951111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paper I: Heterogeneous use of registry data for participant identification and primary outcome ascertainment is found in registry-based randomized controlled trials: A scoping review. Baba A; Tay J; Sammy A; Douglas WA; Goren K; Krause KR; Howie AH; Little J; Oskoui M; Taljaard M; Thombs BD; Potter BK; Butcher NJ; Offringa M J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():289-299. PubMed ID: 37146658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical registries data quality attributes to support registry-based randomised controlled trials: A scoping review. Prang KH; Karanatsios B; Verbunt E; Wong HL; Yeung J; Kelaher M; Gibbs P Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Aug; 119():106843. PubMed ID: 35792338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No differences were found between effect estimates from conventional and registry-based randomized controlled trials. Mathes T; Klaßen P; Pieper D J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():80-91. PubMed ID: 30257186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registry-Based Pragmatic Trials in Heart Failure: Current Experience and Future Directions. Lund LH; Oldgren J; James S Curr Heart Fail Rep; 2017 Apr; 14(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 28247180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting of methodologic information on trial registries for quality assessment: a study of trial records retrieved from the WHO search portal. Reveiz L; Chan AW; Krleza-Jerić K; Granados CE; Pinart M; Etxeandia I; Rada D; Martinez M; Bonfill X; Cardona AF PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12484. PubMed ID: 20824212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research. Zolin SJ; Petro CC; Prabhu AS; Fafaj A; Thomas JD; Horne CM; Tastaldi L; Alkhatib H; Krpata DM; Rosenblatt S; Rosen MJ J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():428-435. PubMed ID: 32619857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient perceptions of the challenges of recruitment to a renal randomised trial registry: a pilot questionnaire-based study. Murphy E; O'Keeffe A; O Shea N; Long E; Eustace JA; Shiely F Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):597. PubMed ID: 34488851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Landscape of cancer clinical trials in Australia: using trial registries to guide future research. Dear RF; Barratt AL; McGeechan K; Askie L; Simes J; Tattersall MH Med J Aust; 2011 Apr; 194(8):387-91. PubMed ID: 21495937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Premature trial discontinuation often not accurately reflected in registries: comparison of registry records with publications. Alturki R; Schandelmaier S; Olu KK; von Niederhäusern B; Agarwal A; Frei R; Bhatnagar N; Hooft L; von Elm E; Briel M J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():56-63. PubMed ID: 27614277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: On the levels of patient selection in registry-based randomized controlled trials. Lasch F; Weber K; Koch A Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):100. PubMed ID: 30717778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the representativeness and generalizability of Japanese clinical trials for localized rectal/colon cancer: Comparing participants in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study with patients in Japanese registries. Miyamoto K; Wakabayashi M; Mizusawa J; Nakamura K; Katayama H; Higashi T; Inomata M; Kitano S; Fujita S; Kanemitsu Y; Fukuda H Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1642-1648. PubMed ID: 32340817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Trials in Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis of World Health Organization-International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. Sivaramakrishnan G; Sridharan K J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 16(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 27449835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]