220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34811990)
1. Initial Experience with Transition from Open to Robotic-assisted Proctectomy for Patients with Rectal Cancer.
Gilshtein H; Neymark M; Harbi A; Lutsyk M; Duek D
Isr Med Assoc J; 2021 Nov; 23(11):731-734. PubMed ID: 34811990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision of Rectal Neoplasia: Clinical Experience With 58 Consecutive Patients.
Tomassi MJ; Taller J; Yuhan R; Ruan JH; Klaristenfeld DD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Mar; 62(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 30451744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?
Bayraktar O; Aytaç E; Özben V; Atasoy D; Bilgin İA; Erenler Bayraktar İ; Baca B; Hamzaoğlu İ; Karahasanoğlu T
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2018 Feb; 28(1):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 29252933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity.
Shaw DD; Wright M; Taylor L; Bertelson NL; Shashidharan M; Menon P; Menon V; Wood S; Ternent CA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 29733247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation.
Park SY; Lee SM; Park JS; Kim HJ; Choi GS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jul; 64(7):812-821. PubMed ID: 33833141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?
Duchalais E; Machairas N; Kelley SR; Landmann RG; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3659-3666. PubMed ID: 29546672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.
Grass JK; Perez DR; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 30470529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic rectal resection: outcomes and learning curve of the initial 100 cases.
Olthof PB; Giesen LJX; Vijfvinkel TS; Roos D; Dekker JWT
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2921-2927. PubMed ID: 32556694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of robotic learning curve on histopathology in rectal cancer: A pooled analysis.
Gachabayov M; Kim SH; Jimenez-Rodriguez R; Kuo LJ; Cianchi F; Tulina I; Tsarkov P; Bergamaschi R
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():121-125. PubMed ID: 32891316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
