178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34812720)
1. A high-fidelity, virtual-reality, transurethral resection of bladder tumor simulator: Validation as a tool for training.
Moore J; Whalen S; Rowe N; Lee JY; Ordon M; Lantz Powers AG
Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Apr; 16(4):E205-E211. PubMed ID: 34812720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Simbla TURBT Simulator in Urological Residency Training: From Needs Analysis to Validation.
de Vries AH; van Genugten HG; Hendrikx AJ; Koldewijn EL; Schout BM; Tjiam IM; van Merriënboer JJ; Muijtjens AM; Wagner C
J Endourol; 2016 May; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 26671712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face, content, and construct validation of the Bristol TURP trainer.
Brewin J; Ahmed K; Khan MS; Jaye P; Dasgupta P
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 24776866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic surgical simulation using low-fidelity and virtual reality transurethral resection simulators in urology simulation boot camp course: trainees feedback assessment study.
Berridge C; Kailavasan M; Athanasiadis G; Gkentzis A; Tassadaq T; Palit V; Rai B; Biyani CS; Nabi G
World J Urol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):3103-3107. PubMed ID: 33394090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National Implementation of Simulator Training Improves Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours in Patients.
Bube SH; Kingo PS; Madsen MG; Vásquez JL; Norus T; Olsen RG; Dahl C; Hansen RB; Konge L; Azawi N
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 May; 39():29-35. PubMed ID: 35528788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-Fidelity Emergency Department Thoracotomy Simulator With Beating-Heart Technology and OSATS Tool Improves Trainee Confidence and Distinguishes Level of Skill.
Bohnen JD; Demetri L; Fuentes E; Butler K; Askari R; Anand RJ; Petrusa E; Kaafarani HMA; Yeh DD; Saillant N; King D; Briggs S; Velmahos GC; Moya M
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(5):1357-1366. PubMed ID: 29496361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Face and content validation of the virtual reality transurethral prostatic resection simulator].
Sun GF; Zhang Y; Yu CF; Meng J; Wang G; Na YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 50(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 22490357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Face, Content, and Construct Validations of Endoscopic Needle Injection Simulator for Transurethral Bulking Agent in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Farhan B; Soltani T; Do R; Perez C; Choi H; Ghoniem G
J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1673-1678. PubMed ID: 29730182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.
Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construct validity of UroSim
Rafi A; Aziz W; Ather MH
Turk J Urol; 2020 Sep; 46(5):373-377. PubMed ID: 32525476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active vs passive haptic feedback technology in virtual reality arthroscopy simulation: Which is most realistic?
Vaghela KR; Trockels A; Carobene M
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 May; 16():249-256. PubMed ID: 33717962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator.
Brewin J; Nedas T; Challacombe B; Elhage O; Keisu J; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 20128776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach.
Tjiam IM; Berkers CH; Schout BM; Brinkman WM; Witjes JA; Scherpbier AJ; Hendrikx AJ; Koldewijn EL
Simul Healthc; 2014 Oct; 9(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 25275719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer.
Sweet R; Kowalewski T; Oppenheimer P; Weghorst S; Satava R
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1953-7. PubMed ID: 15540764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the updated ArthroS simulator: face and construct validity of a passive haptic virtual reality simulator with novel performance metrics.
Garfjeld Roberts P; Guyver P; Baldwin M; Akhtar K; Alvand A; Price AJ; Rees JL
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Feb; 25(2):616-625. PubMed ID: 27085361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy.
Koch AD; Buzink SN; Heemskerk J; Botden SM; Veenendaal R; Jakimowicz JJ; Schoon EJ
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 17516114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.
Nayar SK; Musto L; Fernandes R; Bharathan R
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 188(3):963-971. PubMed ID: 30456516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator.
Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raison N; Kum F; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 26576836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of face validity for the Simbionix LAP mentor virtual reality training module.
Ayodeji ID; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():28-30. PubMed ID: 16404007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator.
Bright E; Vine S; Wilson MR; Masters RS; McGrath JS
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 22366646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
