These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481279)

  • 21. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study.
    Hashim HA; AlBarakati SF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 May; 4(2):60-73. PubMed ID: 12761590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis.
    Al-Jasser NM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):746-50. PubMed ID: 11423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalometric evaluation of white Brazilian adult skeleton.
    Gerhardt De Oliveira M; Salim Silveira V; Whemeyer Fregapani P; Bocchese Gallo T
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(11-12):585-91. PubMed ID: 20027129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthognathic surgical norms for a sample of Saudi adults: Hard tissue measurements.
    Albarakati SF; Baidas LF
    Saudi Dent J; 2010 Jul; 22(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 23960489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative cephalometric study of Class III malocclusion in Saudi and Japanese adult females.
    Bukhary MT
    J Oral Sci; 2005 Jun; 47(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16050488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cephalometric comparison of clinical norms between the Japanese and Caucasians.
    Nezu H; Nagata K; Yoshida Y; Kosaka H; Kikuchi M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Sep; 41(3):450-65. PubMed ID: 6958769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis.
    Yadav AO; Walia CS; Borle RM; Chaoji KH; Rajan R; Datarkar AN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21525673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric floating norms for North American adults.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 9851346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric craniofacial features in Saudi parents and their offspring.
    Alkhudhairi TD; Alkofide EA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1010-7. PubMed ID: 20677948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
    Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative craniofacial variation in Navajo Indians and North American Caucasians.
    Phipps GS; German RZ; Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1988 Jun; 76(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 3414787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Relationships between the incisors and the skeletal vertical type of the face].
    Topouzelis N; Kavadia S; Zafiriadis A; Sidiropoulou S; Markovitsi H; Kolokythas G
    Orthod Epitheor; 1989 Sep; 1(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 2486314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Morphological features of bimaxillary protrusion in Saudis.
    Aldrees AM; Shamlan MA
    Saudi Med J; 2010 May; 31(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 20464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for North Indian population.
    Singh SP; Utreja AK; Jena AK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Oct; 4(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 24403789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations.
    Lahlou K; Bahoum A; Makhoukhi MB; Aalloula el H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20018796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric measurments of a Pakistani adult sample according to Jarabak's analysis.
    Khan T; Ahmed I; Gul-e-Erum
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2013 Nov; 63(11):1345-8. PubMed ID: 24392516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.