These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481352)

  • 1. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants.
    Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3481352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simplified model for studying bone ingrowth.
    Keller JC; Young FA; Trancik TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 3481356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone.
    Sennerby L; Thomsen P; Ericson LE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 1398826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
    Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
    Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of steroid-induced osteoporosis on osseointegration of titanium implants.
    Fujimoto T; Niimi A; Sawai T; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9581403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
    Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical and histomorphometric characterizations of osseointegration during mini-screw healing in rabbit tibiae.
    Wu J; Bai YX; Wang BK
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):558-63. PubMed ID: 19413379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
    Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stability of the miniscrew implant during healing period].
    Wu J; Bai YX; Wang BK; Gao XH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 41(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 16784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits.
    Baker D; London RM; O'Neal R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 10531744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
    Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
    Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a macroscopic groove on bone response and implant stability.
    Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Yang JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1379-85. PubMed ID: 20572831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.