These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481354)

  • 1. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery.
    Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Rhodes ML; Chafetz N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 3481354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
    Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Flygare L; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography: Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery.
    Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Rhodes ML; Chafetz N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 3481355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
    Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
    Almog DM
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 11152191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of multiplanar computed tomography to aid in endosseous implant placement through hydroxylapatite overlay grafts.
    Cliff JA
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2074591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of potential implant sites.
    Murdoch-Kinch CA; Geist JR
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 78(3):38-43, 66. PubMed ID: 9520662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case against routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Pieper SP; Lewis SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 11152192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic techniques.
    Floyd P; Palmer P; Palmer R
    Br Dent J; 1999 Oct; 187(7):359-65. PubMed ID: 10581812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
    Reiskin AB
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery.
    Tepper G; Hofschneider UB; Gahleitner A; Ulm C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 11280364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.