These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34813721)

  • 1. Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?
    Versluys TMM; Flintham EO; Mas-Sandoval A; Savolainen V
    Biol Lett; 2021 Nov; 17(11):20210463. PubMed ID: 34813721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You're Just My Type: Mate Choice and Behavioral Types.
    Munson AA; Jones C; Schraft H; Sih A
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):823-833. PubMed ID: 32451175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female Java sparrows prefer high exploratory males without assortative mating.
    Wang J; Wang D; Chen Q; Zhang J; Racey P; Jiang Y; Wan D; Yin J
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104671. PubMed ID: 35661792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the strength of mate preference from mated pairs observed in the wild.
    Clancey E; Johnson TR; Harmon LJ; Hohenlohe PA
    Evolution; 2022 Jan; 76(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 34792183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
    Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coming of age in your local mating market: Just a numbers game?
    Bowers EK
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 May; 92(5):953-956. PubMed ID: 37132261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The scale-of-choice effect and how estimates of assortative mating in the wild can be biased due to heterogeneous samples.
    Rolán-Alvarez E; Carvajal-Rodríguez A; de Coo A; Cortés B; Estévez D; Ferreira M; González R; Briscoe AD
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1845-57. PubMed ID: 26085130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assortative mating in space and time: patterns and biases.
    Rios Moura R; Oliveira Gonzaga M; Silva Pinto N; Vasconcellos-Neto J; Requena GS
    Ecol Lett; 2021 May; 24(5):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 33617134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assortative mating among Lake Malawi cichlid fish populations is not simply predictable from male nuptial colour.
    Blais J; Plenderleith M; Rico C; Taylor MI; Seehausen O; van Oosterhout C; Turner GF
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 9():53. PubMed ID: 19265521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Probable Case of Incipient Speciation in Schizocosa Wolf Spiders Driven by Allochrony, Habitat Use, and Female Mate Choice.
    Gilman RT; Fowler-Finn K; Hebets EA
    Am Nat; 2018 Sep; 192(3):332-346. PubMed ID: 30125229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
    Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MHC class II-assortative mate choice in European badgers (Meles meles).
    Sin YW; Annavi G; Newman C; Buesching C; Burke T; Macdonald DW; Dugdale HL
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(12):3138-50. PubMed ID: 25913367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate choice in Mus musculus is relative and dependent on the estrous state.
    Zinck L; Lima SQ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66064. PubMed ID: 23762466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assortative mating on blood type: Evidence from one million Chinese pregnancies.
    Hou Y; Tang K; Wang J; Xie D; Zhang H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Dec; 119(51):e2209643119. PubMed ID: 36516065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis.
    Winternitz J; Abbate JL; Huchard E; Havlíček J; Garamszegi LZ
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Jan; 26(2):668-688. PubMed ID: 27859823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.