BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

871 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34813957)

  • 1. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A decision tree analysis to predict clinical outcome of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis.
    Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Kato M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Yabu A; Iwamae M; Sawada Y; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2023 Jul; 23(7):973-981. PubMed ID: 36739978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
    Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.
    Li J; Zhang D; Shen Y; Qi X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):326. PubMed ID: 32795374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short Lumbosacral Decompression Plus Fixation Does Not Change the Spinopelvic Balance on Patients With Moderate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Associated Spinal Stenosis.
    Korovessis P; Syrimpeis V; Tsekouras V
    Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):346-355. PubMed ID: 30660232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does sagittal imbalance impact the surgical outcomes of short-segment fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Hori Y; Matsumura A; Namikawa T; Kato M; Takahashi S; Ohyama S; Ozaki T; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 30391135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Yoshida M
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2010-4. PubMed ID: 23612901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized study.
    Inose H; Kato T; Sasaki M; Matsukura Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Kawabata S; Hirakawa A; Okawa A
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):747-755. PubMed ID: 34963630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and Radiological Study Focused on Relief of Low Back Pain After Decompression Surgery in Selected Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Ikuta K; Masuda K; Tominaga F; Sakuragi T; Kai K; Kitamura T; Senba H; Shidahara S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):E1434-E1443. PubMed ID: 27488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinopelvic sagittal alignment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Zhou Z; Hou C; Li D; Si J
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 30055879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery on sagittal spinopelvic alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Yamada K; Terai H; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 34116508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional outcomes correlate with sagittal spinal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery.
    Thornley P; Urquhart JC; Glennie A; Rampersaud R; Fisher C; Abraham E; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Kwon BK; Manson N; Hall H; Paquette S; Street J; Siddiqi F; Rasoulinejad P; Bailey CS
    Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1512-1521. PubMed ID: 37307882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Results of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Simple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Li P; Shi Z; Jiang Y; Peng Z; Wang Y
    Clin Interv Aging; 2023; 18():911-919. PubMed ID: 37309521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
    Jang JW; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Rhim SC
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.