These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
966 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34813957)
1. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up. Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A decision tree analysis to predict clinical outcome of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis. Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Kato M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Yabu A; Iwamae M; Sawada Y; Nakamura H Spine J; 2023 Jul; 23(7):973-981. PubMed ID: 36739978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system. Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain. Li J; Zhang D; Shen Y; Qi X J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):326. PubMed ID: 32795374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short Lumbosacral Decompression Plus Fixation Does Not Change the Spinopelvic Balance on Patients With Moderate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Associated Spinal Stenosis. Korovessis P; Syrimpeis V; Tsekouras V Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):346-355. PubMed ID: 30660232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Wang D; Chen X; Han D; Wang W; Kong C; Lu S Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1786-1795. PubMed ID: 38093000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does sagittal imbalance impact the surgical outcomes of short-segment fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis? Hori Y; Matsumura A; Namikawa T; Kato M; Takahashi S; Ohyama S; Ozaki T; Yabu A; Nakamura H J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 30391135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis? Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Yoshida M Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2010-4. PubMed ID: 23612901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized study. Inose H; Kato T; Sasaki M; Matsukura Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Kawabata S; Hirakawa A; Okawa A Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):747-755. PubMed ID: 34963630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and Radiological Study Focused on Relief of Low Back Pain After Decompression Surgery in Selected Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Ikuta K; Masuda K; Tominaga F; Sakuragi T; Kai K; Kitamura T; Senba H; Shidahara S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):E1434-E1443. PubMed ID: 27488289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Maayan O; Subramanian T; Samuel AM; Shahi P; Vaishnav AS; Asada T; Amen TB; Tuma OC; Korsun MK; Singh N; Pajak A; Singh S; Araghi K; Sheha ED; Dowdell JE; Iyer S; Qureshi SA J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Oct; 41(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 39094190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinopelvic sagittal alignment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis. Zhou Z; Hou C; Li D; Si J J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 30055879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery on sagittal spinopelvic alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Salimi H; Toyoda H; Yamada K; Terai H; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 34116508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional outcomes correlate with sagittal spinal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery. Thornley P; Urquhart JC; Glennie A; Rampersaud R; Fisher C; Abraham E; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Kwon BK; Manson N; Hall H; Paquette S; Street J; Siddiqi F; Rasoulinejad P; Bailey CS Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1512-1521. PubMed ID: 37307882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Results of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Simple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Li P; Shi Z; Jiang Y; Peng Z; Wang Y Clin Interv Aging; 2023; 18():911-919. PubMed ID: 37309521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]