These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34814461)
1. [Matching in observational research: from the directed acyclic graph perspective]. Luo T; Wang L; Tian T; Fu WH; Pei HL; Zheng YJ; Dai JH Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 34814461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding]. Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Matched designs and causal diagrams. Mansournia MA; Hernán MA; Greenland S Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 42(3):860-9. PubMed ID: 23918854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of the directed acyclic graph to disentangle confounding variables from causal factors in observational studies. Pérez-López FR; Rodríguez I; García-Alfaro P Maturitas; 2024 Jul; 185():107936. PubMed ID: 38350824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias]. Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias. VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA; Robins JM Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 18633331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics. Ananth CV; Schisterman EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types. Suzuki E; Mitsuhashi T; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():101. PubMed ID: 23902658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification]. Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology. Evans D; Chaix B; Lobbedez T; Verger C; Flahault A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 23058038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies. Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Probe variables: a tool for identification of unmeasured confounders in an observational study]. Hong X; Yin JC; Wang B Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):735-739. PubMed ID: 34814460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Potential Outcomes Approach to Selection Bias. Kenah E Epidemiology; 2023 Nov; 34(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 37708480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Directed acyclic graphs: languages, rules and applications]. Zheng YJ; Zhao NQ Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 38(8):1140-1144. PubMed ID: 28847071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]