BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34814624)

  • 1. [The risk prediction models for occurrence of cervical cancer: a systematic review].
    He BJ; Chen WY; Liu LL; Zhu HY; Cheng HZ; Zhang YX; Wang SF; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 42(10):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 34814624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
    He B; Chen W; Liu L; Hou Z; Zhu H; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Zhan S; Wang S
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():654454. PubMed ID: 34026714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Musa J; Achenbach CJ; O'Dwyer LC; Evans CT; McHugh M; Hou L; Simon MA; Murphy RL; Jordan N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183924. PubMed ID: 28873092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
    Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction Models for Gastric Cancer Risk in the General Population: A Systematic Review.
    Gu J; Chen R; Wang SM; Li M; Fan Z; Li X; Zhou J; Sun K; Wei W
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2022 May; 15(5):309-318. PubMed ID: 35017181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
    BMJ; 2021 Oct; 375():n2281. PubMed ID: 34670780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fu H; Hou D; Xu R; You Q; Li H; Yang Q; Wang H; Gao J; Bai D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Jan; 149():104623. PubMed ID: 37944356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk Prediction Model for Esophageal Cancer Among General Population: A Systematic Review.
    Chen R; Zheng R; Zhou J; Li M; Shao D; Li X; Wang S; Wei W
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():680967. PubMed ID: 34926362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
    Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear Machine Learning in Warfarin Dose Prediction: Insights from Contemporary Modelling Studies.
    Zhang F; Liu Y; Ma W; Zhao S; Chen J; Gu Z
    J Pers Med; 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome prediction models incorporating clinical variables for Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review of methodological conduct and risk of bias.
    Aly F; Hansen CR; Al Mouiee D; Sundaresan P; Haidar A; Vinod S; Holloway L
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109629. PubMed ID: 36934895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical appraisal of the prognostic predictive models for patients with sepsis: Which model can be applied in clinical practice?
    Beneyto-Ripoll C; Palazón-Bru A; Llópez-Espinós P; Martínez-Díaz AM; Gil-Guillén VF; de Los Ángeles Carbonell-Torregrosa M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 75(8):e14044. PubMed ID: 33492724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review.
    Mapanga W; Girdler-Brown B; Feresu SA; Chipato T; Singh E
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):198. PubMed ID: 30447695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction Model Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease.
    Huang H; Dong J; Wang S; Shen Y; Zheng Y; Jiang J; Zeng B; Li X; Yang F; Ma S; He Y; Lin F; Chen C; Chen Q; Lv H
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1014067. PubMed ID: 36312287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction models for amputation after diabetic foot: systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Huang J; Yang J; Qi H; Xu M; Xu X; Zhu Y
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2024 Jun; 16(1):126. PubMed ID: 38858732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk prediction models of mortality after hip fracture surgery in older individuals: a systematic review.
    Sun Y; Liu Y; Zhu Y; Luo R; Luo Y; Wang S; Feng Z
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2024 Mar; 40(3):523-535. PubMed ID: 38323327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction Models for Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
    Cheng P; Yang P; Zhang H; Wang H
    Emerg Med Int; 2023; 2023():6780941. PubMed ID: 38035124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction models applying machine learning to oral cavity cancer outcomes: A systematic review.
    Adeoye J; Tan JY; Choi SW; Thomson P
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 154():104557. PubMed ID: 34455119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.