180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34815432)
1. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.
Sunwoo W; Jeon HW; Choi BY
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22809. PubMed ID: 34815432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation.
Shaul C; Bester CW; Weder S; Choi J; Eastwood H; Padmavathi KV; Collins A; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 31083087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.
Lee SY; Kim YS; Jo HD; Kim Y; Carandang M; Huh G; Choi BY
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15135. PubMed ID: 34302030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes.
Lee SY; Jung Bae Y; Carandang M; Kim Y; Hee Han J; Huh G; Song JJ; Koo JW; Ho Lee J; Ha Oh S; Choi BY
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):323-333. PubMed ID: 32826506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrode migration after cochlear implantation.
von Mitzlaff C; Dalbert A; Winklhofer S; Veraguth D; Huber A; Röösli C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Mar; 22(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 33148136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices.
Ayas M; Muzaffar J; Borsetto D; Eitutis S; Phillips V; Tam YC; Salorio-Corbetto M; Bance ML
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299597. PubMed ID: 38452034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Tip Fold-Over of the Slim Modiolar Electrode Using Intraoperative Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Inoue T; Tona Y; Okano T; Omori K; Yamamoto N
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jul; 169(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 36939567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrode impedances in children with cochlear implants: Comparison between intra-operative Switch ON and post-operative Switch ON.
Meghanadh KR; Saxena U; Kumar SBR; Chacko G; N V; S S; Mehta G
Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Mar; 24(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 37354550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Reinsertion Effects Evaluated by Electrode Impedance.
Toner FM; Sanli H; Hall AC; Birman CS
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jul; 41(6):e695-e699. PubMed ID: 32569245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implant electrode array tip-foldover detection by electrode voltage telemetry.
Leblans M; Zarowski A; Molisz A; van Dinther J; Dedeyne J; Lerut B; Kuhweide R; Offeciers E
Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Mar; 24(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 36448741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
